What is the equity structure design of the partner system?

As follows:

1, unitary ownership structure. This refers to the integration of equity ratio, voting right and dividend right. Under this structure, the rights of any shareholder are differentiated according to the proportion of equity. This is also the simplest structure, and what needs to be avoided is the problem of corporate deadlock.

In practice, there are several voting rights "nodes": first, a shareholder holds more than 33.4% of the capital contribution; Second, there are only two shareholders, and the contribution ratio of both parties is 565,438+0% and 49% respectively; Third, the proportion of one party's capital contribution exceeds 66.7%; Fourth, there are two shareholders, and the contribution ratio of each party is 50%.

2. Dual ownership structure. It refers to the equity arrangement of different proportions among equity proportion, voting right (voting right) and dividend right, and the separation of shareholders' rights. After the revision of China's company law, it is stipulated that the articles of association can stipulate that the same shares have different rights. Of course, under the joint-stock company, only different types of shareholders can design this way, and the same shares and rights should be the same.

The partnership system is not omnipotent.

Partner system is the top-level design of enterprise incentive, and it is the tool and means of incentive. The ultimate goal of an enterprise is to improve its performance and achieve its strategic goals.

The partnership system is not omnipotent. First of all, it is not suitable for state-owned enterprises, because it is forbidden to distribute net profit or excess profit to employees, unless it is approved by SASAC, it is suspected of the loss of state-owned assets.

Secondly, it is not suitable for ceiling enterprises. Ceiling enterprises are in recession, and enterprises can only transform or close down. At this time, the enterprise introduced the partner system. One is to pass on business risks, which is purely hooliganism, and the other is that employees will not pay the bill.