Four debates are considered as the conclusion. They must have a broad vision and the ability to grasp the fundamentals. In short, we should sort out the whole context, find out the opposing views, then point out the mistakes made by the other party here, then put forward a correct understanding, and finally explain our reasons from a higher angle.
However, the four debates should make full use of the "bystander" perspective to find out the arguments and arguments of the other side and point out and guide the teammates to attack in time. The speeches in the four debates should carry weight, not be empty words.
So, your problem can be solved like this. One argument and four arguments can better find each other's problems. So they attack (or target), and the person in charge of the attack is two or three arguments.
They should strengthen the problems found by their teammates. So the formal attack is the argument of 23, and the substantive argument of 14 determines the direction. This seems to have a division of labor, rather than fighting separately. This does not include the problem of preparing to throw away in advance, because this is a tactic, not the responsibility of the attack.
Extended data:
Offensive and defensive skills
(1) Innovation. From the point of view, freshness should not be logical freshness, because freshness should not only give the audience a bright feeling at the moment, but also make it easy for the audience to accept, while logical freshness is not easy for people to accept in a short time.
(2) For the questions thrown by opponents, you can pass the buck, and there is no need to answer with an absolute answer.
(3) Any idea is useful to both sides, depending on how you use it.
(4) Grasping each other's loopholes must be accurate, and you can't subjectively guess each other's intentions.
(5) Learn to give examples. We should consider which examples to give and how to give them in an offensive way.
Baidu encyclopedia-the fourth debater