654381October 6, a case of imported asymptomatic recurrent infection was reported in Hangzhou, Zhejiang. At the same time, the relevant departments found that the identity information, contact number and other personal privacy information of asymptomatic infected people were widely spread on the Internet. After investigation, the public security organs found two illegal acts of spreading rumors online, and the source of all this was Lin, a doctor in a hospital in Xihu District, Hangzhou.
He forwarded the relevant streaming reports to the WeChat group, causing the identity information of asymptomatic infected people to be? Open? . In the process of identity information dissemination, Zhang and Hu took the opportunity to spread rumors and were punished by the public security organs for seven days of administrative detention. As for the initiator, Dr. Lin, he was punished by the public security organ for five days of administrative detention. At the same time, Lin's behavior violated the patient's privacy, which will undoubtedly bring trouble to his family.
Not only that, I think this doctor lacks professional ethics. As a doctor, it is his bounden duty to save lives, and it is a doctor's basic professional ethics to keep patients' personal information strictly confidential. But Li does not keep the personal information of patients strictly confidential, but shares the information of asymptomatic infected people? Is it public? . Such behavior is undoubtedly unprofessional. I hope he can reflect on his mistakes in the detention center.
As the Spring Festival approaches, large-scale population mobility is the general trend, and epidemic prevention and control is under severe pressure. To this end, all localities have called on people to celebrate the New Year locally. The Chengdu Municipal Government even issued relevant regulations requiring party member cadres to set an example and take the lead in celebrating the New Year in Chengdu. We must believe that the government will firmly control the epidemic, instead of listening to online rumors, spreading rumors and making people panic. There will be an epidemic this year, but the scale depends on whether we can respond to the government's call and reduce going out.
In summary, the doctor's behavior violated the patient's privacy and was suspected of violating the law. At the same time, we should actively respond to the government's call.