Why is it so simple for a single woman to "get married" twice and have two suites under her name and steal other people's information to buy a house?

It was her former colleague who stole Ms. Chen's information. He used his convenience to enter and review the location of the purchase information, so that Ms. Chen had no reason? Married? Twice, twice to buy a house. During this time, Ms. Chen, a single woman in Changsha, was surprised to find that her information was stolen because she failed to pass the house purchase audit.

Not just? Get married? Twice, she bought two suites, which made her unable to afford a house now. Later, Ms. Chen discovered that her identity information had been stolen by her former colleagues, and she successfully passed the qualification examination for buying a house, which was incredible.

1. Information leaked and used by former colleagues. After discovering that her information had been stolen, Ms. Chen was puzzled and suddenly thought that a former colleague had jumped ship and went to the real estate under her name to engage in sales work. Ms. Chen quickly contacted this former colleague. The other party clearly knew about it, and kept saying that his apprentice did it, and wanted to discuss it with Ms. Chen. Ms. Chen realized that her information had been stolen by him.

As we all know, when working in a company, you need to leave your identity information and related materials when you go through the entry formalities or submit some materials. Ms. Chen herself recalled that it was probably when she submitted the information that her former colleagues got her information. I didn't expect the other party to steal their own information.

Indeed, we are often disappointed by familiar people and reveal our information to each other. This book comes from our trust in him. But sometimes this trust can also lead to unnecessary disasters. So remember that personal information can't be disclosed to others casually, so be careful.

2. Stealing other people's information, and (former colleague) the property consultant abused his power. Why can Ms. Chen's former colleague (or her so-called apprentice) use other people's information to buy a house? Because he is a real estate consultant for real estate sellers. Through the dialogue between Ms. Chen and the seller of the property, it is entirely up to the property consultant to buy a house and register the qualification of buying a house in the property. Property consultants also need to help buyers register and enter information into the system before buying a house.

Property consultants can directly enter the purchase information, and even forge or modify the information. So the former colleague (or his so-called apprentice) deliberately stole Ms. Chen's identity information and disguised herself as another person's wife, realizing two marriages and buying a house. This kind of abuse of power is not an act of abiding by professional ethics, but also illegal. If it is found out that this former colleague (or his so-called apprentice) did it, he (they) must be punished by law.

3. Are there any dereliction of duty between the real estate seller and the real estate center? The strangest thing about this is how these stolen and forged materials passed the system review. In this incident, it is obvious that the property consultant is the author or even the auditor of the qualification examination of the house purchase; The real estate seller said that he knew nothing and stated that such behavior was not allowed; The real estate center seems to be just a department that registers information, and it is completely unaware of this kind of misappropriation of information.

Generally speaking, the originals and copies of relevant materials need to be submitted for review. Ms. Chen is not married, which means that she has no marriage certificate and no information in the marriage registration office. And the real estate seller said that there was no audit. Is this dereliction of duty in real estate? Does the real estate center also need to review and save relevant information? This may be a loophole in the qualification examination of house purchase. This was taken advantage of by some immoral people, and Ms. Chen's situation also started from this.

Generally speaking, Ms. Chen's information was stolen by a familiar former colleague. The other party also used the convenience of her position to forge marriage information and buy a house without Ms. Chen's knowledge, so that Ms. Chen, who is single, has two suites. This incident reminds us to protect our personal information. If the information is stolen, call the police immediately like Ms. Chen to avoid greater losses.