Article 1 In order to strengthen and improve the evaluation of science and technology, establish and improve the evaluation system of science and technology, standardize the evaluation activities of science and technology, and correctly guide the healthy development of science and technology, these Measures are formulated in accordance with relevant national laws and regulations and the Decision on Improving the Evaluation of Science and Technology.
Article 2 Scientific and technological evaluation is an important part of scientific and technological management, and it is an important means and guarantee to promote the sustained and healthy development of national scientific and technological undertakings, promote the optimal allocation of scientific and technological resources and improve the level of scientific and technological management.
Article 3 The term "scientific and technological evaluation" as mentioned in these Measures refers to the activities such as demonstration, evaluation, appraisal, evaluation and acceptance of scientific and feasible methods of scientific and technological activities and matters related to scientific and technological activities by the entrusting party according to its clear objectives and prescribed principles, procedures and standards.
These Measures shall apply to the scientific and technological evaluation of scientific and technological plans, projects, institutions, personnel and achievements funded by central or local financial funds.
Article 4 The evaluation of science and technology should follow the requirements of "goal-oriented, classified implementation, objectivity and fairness, and pay attention to actual results", and must be conducive to encouraging original innovation, promoting the transformation and industrialization of scientific and technological achievements, discovering and cultivating outstanding talents, creating a relaxed environment for innovation, and preventing and punishing academic misconduct.
Fifth scientific and technological evaluation must adhere to the principles of fairness, justice and openness, and ensure that the evaluation activities are based on objective facts to make scientific evaluation.
Article 6 The Ministry of Science and Technology is the competent department of science and technology evaluation, and is responsible for the macro management, overall coordination, supervision and inspection of national science and technology evaluation. Other relevant departments in the State Council shall be responsible for the relevant scientific and technological evaluation according to their respective responsibilities.
The administrative department of science and technology of the local people's government at or above the county level shall be responsible for guiding, managing and supervising the scientific and technological evaluation activities within its jurisdiction.
Chapter II Basic Procedures and Requirements
Article 7 The subjects of scientific and technological evaluation include the entrusting party, the entrusted party and the evaluated party. The entrusting party refers to the party who puts forward the evaluation demand, mainly the administrative departments of science and technology at all levels or other institutions responsible for the management of scientific and technological activities; The entrusted party refers to the party entrusted by the entrusted party to organize the implementation or implementation of evaluation activities, mainly including professional evaluation institutions, evaluation expert committees or evaluation expert groups; The appraised party refers to the institution, organization or individual that applies for, undertakes or participates in the scientific and technological activities organized and implemented by the entrusting party.
Eighth scientific and technological evaluation work should generally be entrusted by the entrusting party to a professional evaluation institution, evaluation expert committee or evaluation expert group as the entrusted party.
Article 9 The entrusting party shall put forward clear normative requirements for the scientific and technological evaluation of the entrusted party, and sign a written contract or task book with the entrusted party. The main terms of the contract shall include:
(a) the evaluation object and content;
(2) evaluation objectives;
(3) Evaluation methods, standards and specific procedures;
(four) the requirements of the evaluation report;
(5) Assessment fees and payment methods;
(six) the confidentiality of relevant information and materials;
(7) Other necessary contents.
The appraisal fee is paid by the entrusting party, not by the appraised party. According to the needs or the contract, the bid evaluation objectives, methods, standards, procedures and other related contents in the bid evaluation contract shall be made public and subject to social supervision.
Article 10 After accepting the entrustment, the trustee shall make an evaluation work plan according to the contract, and independently carry out the evaluation work with the consent of the entrusting party, and no organization or individual may interfere.
Article 11 The trustee shall select qualified evaluation experts to carry out evaluation activities according to the evaluation objects, contents and evaluation objectives. According to the needs of the work, the entrusting party can also directly choose to set up an evaluation expert committee or expert group as the entrusted party, and the entrusted party can independently carry out evaluation activities.
Article 12 The trustee may collect the information needed for evaluation by means of on-the-spot investigation, expert consultation, information inquiry and social investigation. On the basis of qualitative and quantitative analysis, conduct analysis and comprehensive evaluation, form an evaluation report, and submit it to the entrusting party on time for archiving.
Thirteenth assessment reports shall generally include the following contents:
(1) Names or lists of bid evaluation institutions, bid evaluation expert committees and bid evaluation experts;
(2) Name of the entrusting party;
(three) the purpose, object and content of the evaluation;
(four) evaluation principles, methods and standards;
(5) evaluation procedures;
(6) Evaluation results;
(seven) the contract or other issues that need to be explained.
The information related to the evaluation collected during the evaluation process and other information that needs an appendix can be used as an attachment.
Article 14 The bid evaluation results shall be produced by the bid evaluation expert committee or the bid evaluation expert group through meetings or communication. There are special agreements on the review of major scientific and technological plans, projects, achievements, important institutions, personnel and other contracts, which will be produced by secret ballot.
If the evaluation experts have different opinions, they shall record them truthfully and keep them confidential.
Article 15 When necessary, the entrusting party may, on the premise of ensuring no infringement, no disclosure and national security, publish the relevant evaluation results within a certain scope in an appropriate way, and inform the appraised party or its unit when necessary.
If the evaluated party or any other unit or individual has any objection to the evaluation results, it may lodge a complaint in accordance with the provisions of these Measures.
Article 16 The evaluation results are an important reference for the entrusting party to make scientific and technological decisions, and can be used as the basis for giving, continuing to subsidize or terminating scientific and technological research and development to the evaluated party. The decision-making behavior made according to the evaluation results shall be borne by the decision-making actor.
The evaluated party should adjust and improve its own scientific and technological activities in time according to the positive and negative evaluation results and suggestions.
Chapter III Selection of Bid Evaluation Experts
Seventeenth establish and improve the evaluation expert qualification examination system. The bid evaluation experts shall meet the following conditions:
(a) with a high level of professional knowledge and practical experience, keen insight and strong judgment ability, familiar with the evaluation content and the development of related fields at home and abroad.
(two) with good credit and scientific ethics, serious and rigorous, impartial, objective and fair, enthusiastic about science and technology, dare to take responsibility.
Eighteenth establish and improve the evaluation expert database. The evaluation expert database shall include scientific and technological experts, economists and management experts from research and development institutions, universities, enterprises and other units, and be updated in time according to the development trend of science and technology and management needs.
The administrative departments of science and technology at all levels shall, jointly with relevant departments and units, establish a cross-industry, cross-departmental, cross-regional and cross-professional sharing mechanism for evaluation expert database.
Nineteenth selection of bid evaluation experts shall abide by the following principles:
(1) randomness principle. The bid evaluation experts who participate in specific bid evaluation activities should generally be randomly selected from the bid evaluation expert database according to the requirements and conditions. When necessary, a certain proportion of management experts, economists, entrepreneurs and user representatives can be selected to participate. The selected expert committees or expert groups should reflect the representativeness of different disciplines, different professional technologies, different academic viewpoints, different units and different regions, and a certain proportion of experts engaged in actual research and development should participate.
(2) the principle of avoidance. Appraisal experts who have an interest in the appraised party or other relations that may affect justice cannot participate in the appraisal. Those who have been selected should take the initiative to declare their withdrawal. The auditee can put forward a certain number of experts' suggestions to avoid according to the regulations and explain the reasons.
The entrusting party or the entrusted party may announce the list of bid evaluation experts to the public in an appropriate way before or after the bid evaluation according to needs, so as to enhance the sense of responsibility and honor of bid evaluation experts and accept social supervision.
(3) the principle of replacement. The standing evaluation expert committee or expert group established by the entrusting party or the entrusted party shall be replaced regularly, and its members shall not be re-elected for more than two terms, and a certain replacement ratio shall be maintained.
Twentieth bid evaluation experts should strictly abide by the relevant laws, regulations, rules and policies of the state, abide by professional ethics, adhere to the principles of independence, objectivity, impartiality and science, and consciously accept the supervision of relevant parties.
Article 21 On the premise of safeguarding national security and national interests, a certain proportion of overseas experts are invited to participate in the formulation of major scientific and technological plans without confidentiality requirements, the selection of priority funding areas, and the evaluation of major projects and important "non-knowledge" projects and important R&D institutions and personnel.
Chapter IV Evaluation of Science and Technology Plan
Article 22 The evaluation of science and technology plan should be oriented to meet the strategic needs of science and technology, economic and social development and national security, and the focus of evaluation should be to promote the breakthrough and solution of major scientific and technological issues in national economic and social development and major issues at the forefront of science and technology.
Twenty-third science and technology plan evaluation is mainly to evaluate the establishment and implementation effect of major national or local science and technology plans (including "projects" and "special projects"), so as to provide a basis for improving the decision-making and management of science and technology plans and optimizing the allocation of resources.
Twenty-fourth science and technology plan evaluation includes early evaluation, mid-term evaluation and performance evaluation.
(a) the initial evaluation is mainly to evaluate the necessity, feasibility, positioning, objectives, tasks, investment, organization and management of the proposed science and technology plan, and provide a basis for strategic decision-making, plan design and organization and implementation.
(two) the mid-term evaluation is mainly to evaluate the progress and existing problems in the implementation of the science and technology plan, and to provide a basis for the arrangement and adjustment of the subsequent science and technology plan.
(3) Performance evaluation is mainly to evaluate the realization degree, completion effect and influence, the benefit of capital investment and the effectiveness of organization and management of the science and technology plan, so as to provide a basis for the rolling implementation, adjustment or termination of the science and technology plan.
Twenty-fifth science and technology plan evaluation should generally choose independent professional evaluation institutions or evaluation expert committees as trustees. The trustee shall, according to different types of science and technology plans, select high-level experts in science and technology, economy, management and other related fields to participate in the evaluation.
Twenty-sixth major science and technology plan performance evaluation cycle is determined according to its implementation cycle, for a long implementation cycle of science and technology plan generally once every five years or so.
Chapter V Evaluation of Science and Technology Projects
Twenty-seventh scientific and technological projects classified evaluation. According to the different characteristics of various scientific and technological projects, select and determine reasonable evaluation procedures, evaluation standards and methods, and pay attention to evaluation effectiveness.
Full evaluation of major scientific and technological projects, including project evaluation, mid-term evaluation and completion acceptance, can be carried out within 2 to 5 years after the completion of the project according to needs. General scientific and technological project evaluation should focus on project evaluation and acceptance, and implement the annual progress report system.
Article 28 The evaluation of strategic basic research projects should be oriented to solving major basic scientific problems in the development of economy, society, national security and science itself, highlighting the organic combination of national goals and scientific development goals, and paying attention to the original innovation and integrated innovation of the scientific frontier, the potential contribution to the country's major needs and the cultivation of outstanding talents.
(a) evaluation experts should be selected from experts with rich research experience, keen academic vision, strong strategic awareness and wide knowledge, and pay attention to attracting experts engaged in high-level research and familiar with the development status and trends of similar disciplines at home and abroad.
(two) the project evaluation should be based on the objectives and requirements of the corresponding science and technology plan, and the evaluation index system should be established, mainly from the aspects of academic innovation, scientific and social value, innovation ability of research team, work basis and research conditions. ; The mid-term evaluation and completion acceptance shall evaluate the implementation and completion of the target tasks according to the requirements of the project contract or task book.
(3) Post-performance evaluation mainly evaluates the innovation, scientific value and economic and social benefits of the project.
Twenty-ninth free exploratory basic research project evaluation should be based on the protection of freedom of scientific research, encourage scientific exploration and original innovation, and pay attention to scientific value and personnel training.
(a) the evaluation experts are mainly selected from experts who are familiar with the frontier development of this discipline or related disciplines, have a keen academic vision and a certain research foundation.
(two) the project review should adopt the method of peer review, focusing on the innovation, research value, goal setting and research plan of the project, and don't overemphasize the expected results of the project.
(three) the project evaluation should be the focus of the evaluation work, generally do not organize special mid-term evaluation and completion acceptance, but should submit the annual progress report and completion report of the project.
For exploratory or obviously innovative "non-knowledge" research projects, we should focus on evaluating the innovation ability and potential, academic level and scientific rigor of the evaluated party. In case of great disputes or differences, the different review opinions signed by the review experts and the respondent's defense reasons shall be submitted to the entrusting party for examination and approval. We should strengthen the management and post-performance evaluation of such projects, focusing on the quality of output and the contribution and potential value of original innovation.
Article 30 The evaluation of applied research projects should be closely combined with the needs of economic construction and social development, guided by technology popularization and market traction, and focus on the innovation and integration level of technical theory, key technologies and core high technologies, the output of independent intellectual property rights, potential economic benefits and social benefits.
(1) The evaluation experts are mainly selected from scientific and technological experts, management experts, economists, technical leaders of enterprises and representatives of potential users.
(two) the project evaluation should focus on the importance and necessity of the research objectives and contents, the innovation and practicability of technology, the feasibility of the research plan, the technical strength and research foundation, and the expected application prospect; Mid-term evaluation and final acceptance focus on the realization and potential application value of the objectives established in the project contract or task book.
(III) Post-performance evaluation of major applied research projects mainly includes comprehensive evaluation of technological innovation and integration level, breakthrough and mastery of key technologies, output of independent intellectual property rights, formulation of technical standards, and economic and social benefits. Projects focusing on applied basic research should also examine the quality of academic papers.
Thirty-first scientific and technological industrialization project evaluation should be based on the establishment of scientific and technological achievements transformation and industrialization mechanism with enterprises as the main body, the development of high-tech industries, optimization and adjustment of industrial structure, and efforts to cultivate high-tech enterprises with independent innovation capabilities.
(a) Evaluation experts should be selected from scientific and technical experts, economists, management experts, entrepreneurs and user representatives.
(two) the evaluation of major scientific and technological industrialization projects shall entrust a professional evaluation institution to conduct a full evaluation. The evaluation results can be provided to other investors as needed.
(three) the project evaluation should be based on the national development strategy and industrial policy requirements, the establishment of evaluation index system, focusing on promoting industrial technology upgrading, guiding the formation of emerging industries and promoting social sustainable development, or supporting the integration with major national projects; Mid-term evaluation and completion acceptance shall evaluate the realization of contract objectives and assessment indicators according to the requirements of the project contract or task book.
(four) the late performance evaluation of major scientific and technological industrialization projects is mainly based on market evaluation, and the economic and social benefits are evaluated by qualitative evaluation methods and econometric methods.
Article 32 The evaluation of social welfare research projects should focus on solving scientific and technological problems in the development of national strategic public welfare undertakings, enhancing the ability of science and technology to provide scientific and technological support and services for major social welfare issues, providing technical support for coordinated social and economic development, and improving people's living standards, and focusing on the advanced technical support and service system, the ability and level of enjoying * * * and services, and the potential social benefits.
(a) the evaluation expert committee (or expert group) should be composed of experts engaged in social welfare research, management experts and user representatives.
(2) Social welfare research projects should fully consider the characteristics of social welfare, and establish an evaluation index system from the aspects of technical support and service ability and level, * * enjoyment, social benefits and service effects.
(3) According to the characteristics of long-term, service and enjoyment of social welfare research, long-term follow-up investigation is conducted on social welfare research, and attention is paid to establishing a monitoring, early warning and emergency technical service system in the field of social welfare.
Article 33 The evaluation of scientific and technological conditions construction and supporting service projects should be oriented to providing scientific and technological conditions support and public services for scientific and technological development, economic and social development and national security, with the contribution to the sustainable development of national economy, society and science and technology as the evaluation focus.
(a) the evaluation experts should be selected from experts, economists, management experts and user representatives who are mainly engaged in the construction of scientific and technological conditions.
(two) according to the characteristics of scientific and technological resources and conditions, establish an evaluation index system by classification. Among them, the evaluation of conditional construction projects should pay attention to the accuracy, completeness, enjoyment, application rate, advanced and effective technology, high efficiency of operation and maintenance, and ability to provide services of scientific and technological basic conditions and resources (including natural and human resources, data, standards, information, facilities, etc.). ); The evaluation of supporting service projects should pay attention to the basic conditions of science and technology, the integrity, openness, integration and enjoyment of resource information, the advanced, effective and standardized service means and the satisfaction of services.
(three) the construction of scientific and technological conditions and support services to implement long-term follow-up inspection, pay attention to social benefits and service effects, usually can not be published academic papers or patents as the main evaluation index.
Chapter VI Evaluation of Research and Development Institutions
Article 34 Research and development institutions should be guided by strengthening the construction of the national innovation system and establishing a modern research and development management system, and focus on development goals and positioning, research and development capabilities, talent team building, condition construction and service level, operation mechanism and innovation environment construction, and scientific and technological output performance.
Article 35 A research and development institution shall entrust an evaluation institution or an evaluation expert committee with professional evaluation qualifications as its trustee. A certain proportion of overseas experts shall be invited to participate in the evaluation of important research and development institutions such as basic research and public welfare research.
Thirty-sixth research and development institutions should be classified and evaluated according to their functional orientation, mission objectives, operating mechanism and other characteristics.
(a) the evaluation of basic research institutions should focus on the original innovation ability and international scientific frontier competitiveness, mainly to evaluate the scientific nature of disciplines and specialties, the overall level and training ability of academic leaders and talent groups, cooperation and exchanges at home and abroad, the enjoyment of scientific research conditions, the output level of achievements and papers, and the status and influence in related fields at home and abroad.
(II) The evaluation of social welfare research institutions focuses on its technical support and service ability to the national economy and people's livelihood and social sustainable development, and mainly evaluates the consistency of its development direction with national demand, scientific and technological innovation and service ability, the overall level of talent team, the social effect produced by the application of scientific and technological achievements, the perfection of basic conditions of science and technology, the enjoyment level of * * * and the service quality.
(3) the evaluation of technology development institutions focuses on their research and development capabilities of new technologies, new products and new processes and their ability to transform them into real productive forces, mainly evaluating their ability to acquire and protect independent intellectual property rights, their contribution to the scientific and technological progress of the industry and the development of high-tech industries, and their economic benefits. The evaluation of such institutions should be based on market evaluation.
Thirty-seventh research and development institutions mainly funded by the government shall be entrusted by the competent department of science and technology in conjunction with relevant departments, and the evaluation results shall be suitable for the level of government financial input.
Thirty-eighth research and development institutions should conduct regular evaluation, the evaluation period is generally 3 to 5 years.
Chapter VII Evaluation of Research and Development Personnel
Thirty-ninth research and development personnel evaluation is oriented to promote the formation of a "fair and open" competition and cooperation mechanism and outstanding talents to stand out, with their representative output and performance, innovation potential and professional ethics as the evaluation focus.
Fortieth bid evaluation experts shall be selected from scientific and technical experts and management experts, and the personnel of the unit where the bid evaluation personnel belong shall be invited to participate.
Forty-first research and development personnel should be evaluated according to their work nature and post, and the corresponding evaluation standards should be determined and classified.
(a) the evaluation of basic researchers should focus on their innovative research ability and potential, academic level, work performance, academic influence, etc.
(two) the evaluation of applied researchers should focus on the innovation and integration ability and potential of their core technologies and key technologies, work performance, independent intellectual property rights, etc.
(3) the evaluation of personnel engaged in the transformation and industrialization of scientific and technological achievements should be based on market evaluation, focusing on their ability to promote the transformation and industrialization of scientific and technological achievements, as well as the economic and social benefits achieved, and generally not publishing academic papers as the main evaluation index.
(4) The evaluation of technicians engaged in condition guarantee and experiment should focus on their ability and level of providing services for R&D activities, work quality, sense of responsibility and service satisfaction. , and generally not to publish academic papers or achievements, patents as the main evaluation index.
Forty-second evaluation of research and development personnel should be combined with individual evaluation and group evaluation, and pay attention to the role of personnel in the research group.
Personnel evaluation should mainly evaluate the innovation ability and potential of the leader, the ability to grasp the direction of research and development, the level of research and development, the actual contribution, the ability of organization and coordination, etc. The evaluation of the personnel in the group can be carried out by the group leader.
Forty-third evaluation of R&D personnel should be based on the different nature and characteristics of the post, combined with the employment situation to determine the evaluation period, generally 3 to 5 years.
Chapter VIII Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Achievements
Article 44 The evaluation of scientific and technological achievements is guided by encouraging innovation, accelerating personnel training, promoting the transformation and industrialization of scientific and technological achievements, and promoting the close integration of science and technology with economic and social development, with scientific value or technical level and market prospect as the evaluation focus.
Article 45 The entrusting party shall, as required, entrust a professional appraisal institution or appraisal expert committee as the entrusted party to evaluate the results. The administrative departments of science and technology at all levels generally do not organize the evaluation of achievements according to the requirements put forward by the evaluated party.
Article 46 The entrusting party shall reduce the evaluation results directly organized, especially the evaluation results of market-oriented application technologies. After the acceptance of general scientific and technological projects, the results will no longer be evaluated separately, but major projects or achievements with important innovation and great value should be evaluated in a timely manner as needed.
The evaluation results submitted by the expert recommendation system shall be recommended by three or more experts who are familiar with the field jointly or individually to the entrusting party.
Forty-seventh results evaluation should choose a certain proportion of peer experts as evaluation experts. Under the premise of not harming national security and interests, overseas experts can be invited to participate in the evaluation of results as appropriate.
Forty-eighth results evaluation should be based on the nature and characteristics of the results to determine the evaluation criteria, classification evaluation.
(a) the results of basic research should be based on clarifying natural phenomena, characteristics and laws, and there are major discoveries and innovations in the field of basic research, and the scientific level and scientific value of new discoveries and new theories. Representative papers published in influential academic journals at home and abroad and their citation should be used as an important reference index for evaluation.
(two) the application of technological achievements should be based on the application of scientific and technological knowledge in scientific research, technological development, subsequent development and application promotion to obtain new technologies and new products, obtain independent intellectual property rights, promote productivity improvement, and obtain economic and social benefits as the evaluation focus. The technical indicators, input-output ratio and potential market economic value of applied technological achievements should be taken as important reference indicators for evaluation.
(3) The scientific value and significance of research results, the innovation of viewpoints, methods and theories, and the role and influence on scientific decision-making and management modernization should be the evaluation focus of soft science research results. The research difficulty and complexity, economic benefits and social benefits of soft science research results should be taken as important reference indicators for evaluation.
Article 49 The assessed party shall provide complete and complete technical data and relevant documents, and when necessary, provide testing and retrieval reports or certification materials issued by specialized agencies such as professional testing and retrieval institutions.
In all the information provided to the evaluation experts related to the evaluated results, the name of the unit and the name of the person who completed the results should be hidden.
Fiftieth to evaluate the achievements of applying for national or local science and technology awards, we should abide by the laws, regulations and other relevant provisions of the state on science and technology awards.
Article 51 The scientific, technical and economic connotations of the evaluation results should be comprehensively analyzed on the basis of sufficient comparative data at home and abroad or retrieval of supporting materials, and abstract terms such as "domestic advanced", "domestic initiative", "international leading", "international advanced" and "filling gaps" should not be abused. Falsification and formalism are strictly prohibited.
Chapter IX Legal Liability
Fifty-second parties and personnel involved in the evaluation work must strictly abide by laws, regulations and other relevant provisions to ensure the fairness and objectivity of scientific and technological evaluation.
Establish and improve the reputation system of evaluation institutions and evaluation experts. After the evaluation, the entrusting party shall truthfully record the fairness and objectivity of the entrusted party's evaluation; The trustee shall truthfully record the impartiality, objectivity, evaluation opinions and working attitude of the evaluation experts in the evaluation work; The entrusting party shall establish records of violations and mistakes of professional evaluation institutions and experts.
Article 53 The entrusting party may set up a scientific and technological evaluation and supervision committee as required. The members of the supervision committee are composed of management experts, scientific and technological experts, legal experts and relevant staff.
The supervisory committee is mainly responsible for supervising scientific and technological evaluation activities, accepting and handling complaints and reports on major issues that occur in the evaluation process.
Fifty-fourth any unit or individual that finds problems in scientific and technological evaluation activities may complain and report to the entrusting party and the scientific and technological evaluation supervision committee. Complainants and informants shall provide written materials showing their true identity and provide necessary supporting materials.
The entrusting party and the Science and Technology Evaluation Supervision Committee shall handle the matter in accordance with the relevant provisions of these Measures. If a report is signed, the informant and the contents of the report shall be kept confidential. After the investigation, verification and handling of complaints and reports, the complainant and informant shall be informed of the results of verification and handling, and their opinions shall be listened to. If there are specific facts about the materials reported anonymously, preliminary verification shall be conducted to determine the handling method. A report without signature, contact information and specific facts will not be accepted by the entrusting party or the board of supervisors.
Article 55 If any staff member of the entrusting party engages in malpractices for personal gain, abuses his power, neglects his duty or interferes with the evaluation work, resulting in unfair evaluation, he shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations; If the case constitutes a crime, it shall be transferred to judicial organs for criminal responsibility.
Article 56 If the trustee violates the provisions of these Measures in the appraisal work, resulting in serious inaccuracies in the appraisal results, the entrusting party may order him to make corrections, give a warning, informed criticism, terminate the appraisal entrustment or cancel the appraisal qualification. If it constitutes a violation of discipline, it is recommended that the relevant departments give disciplinary action; If the case constitutes a crime, it shall be transferred to judicial organs for criminal responsibility. Those who cause economic losses to others shall be liable for compensation.
Fifty-seventh bid evaluation experts in violation of the provisions of these measures in the bid evaluation work, the client can be ordered to correct, given a warning, informed criticism, cancel their qualification to participate in the bid evaluation work; If it constitutes a violation of discipline, it is recommended that the relevant units give disciplinary action; If the case constitutes a crime, it shall be transferred to judicial organs for criminal responsibility.
Article 58 If the appraised party provides false data and information in the evaluation process, which interferes with the independent, objective and fair development of the evaluation work, resulting in serious inaccuracy of the evaluation results, the entrusting party may order it to correct, give a warning, informed criticism, cancel the qualification of the appraised party, terminate the project contract or cancel its qualification to undertake scientific and technological projects within a certain period of time. If it constitutes a violation of discipline, it is recommended that the relevant departments give disciplinary action; If the case constitutes a crime, it shall be transferred to judicial organs for criminal responsibility.
Chapter X Supplementary Provisions
Article 59 The administrative departments of science and technology at all levels and other institutions responsible for the management of scientific and technological activities shall, in accordance with these Measures, revise, improve or formulate specific management measures and detailed rules for the scientific and technological evaluation activities of their own departments, local science and technology plans, projects, institutions, personnel and achievements, and revise the existing specific evaluation measures and detailed rules that do not conform to the provisions of these Measures.
Sixtieth other scientific and technological evaluation activities can be implemented with reference to these measures.
Article 61 The Ministry of Science and Technology shall be responsible for the interpretation of these Measures.
Article 62 These Measures shall come into force as of the date of promulgation.