Case analysis of administrative litigation

1. This case belongs to the scope of administrative litigation. Reason: The execution of administrative detention is a part of the punishment decision of administrative detention made by public security organs, and the detention center is also established and managed according to law, so the execution of administrative detention is a specific administrative act. If a party considers that the public security organ has not performed or fully performed its corresponding duties in the process of administrative detention, or there are illegal management situations that infringe upon its legitimate rights and interests, it may bring an administrative lawsuit according to law. If personal injury, death or economic losses are caused, the parties may also apply for state compensation according to law. 2. Whether Liu's father has the right to file an administrative lawsuit depends on whether Liu is an adult and his marital status. Reason: If Liu Chengnian is married (with or without children), after his death, according to relevant laws and regulations, the order of inheritance should be spouse, children and parents. Liu's father is not the legal heir in the first order, so in this case, Liu's father does not have the subject qualification to file an administrative lawsuit. If Liu was underage or single before his death, Liu's father could claim Liu's rights as the legal representative or the first heir. In this case, Liu's father is eligible to file an administrative lawsuit. 3. If Liu's father is recognized as the subject of administrative litigation, he shall bring an administrative lawsuit to the people's court where Yuexiu District Public Security Bureau is located. Reason: The administrative detention center belongs to the internal organization of Yuexiu Public Security Bureau in Guangzhou, not an independent law enforcement agency, and it is not qualified as a defendant. Guangzhou Yuexiu District Public Security Bureau is a public security organ at or above the county level. It has the legal qualification of independent law enforcement, conducts administrative activities in its own name, and independently bears the legal responsibilities arising therefrom.