Briefly describe the composition of public crisis management system.

A: According to the factors such as the role played by public * * * management subjects in public * * * crisis management and their direct participation in the crisis management process, the public * * * crisis management system is divided into five major systems:

(1) decision system. Decision-making system occupies a core position in public crisis management, which essentially reflects a country's strategic decision-making efficiency and crisis response ability.

(2) Unified command and comprehensive coordination system. Unified command and comprehensive coordination system is in the core leadership position in public security crisis management, which is conducive to ensuring the efficient and coordinated operation between executive departments and avoiding delaying the fighter plane and affecting crisis rescue because of mutual wrangling and shirking.

(3) executive system. The executive department is responsible for a large number of daily crisis prevention and rapid response, becoming the backbone and backbone of the public crisis management system and the direct action force of public crisis management.

(4) auxiliary system. The public crisis management auxiliary system mainly refers to those departments that have special professional skills, business scope, specific resources, equipment and capabilities, are in charge of special affairs and undertake some special tasks in emergency response. They are equivalent to the logistics system of crisis management, and do not have the function of crisis management directly, but provide various services needed in the process of crisis management.

(5) Information and staff consultation system. Emergency command and decision center needs timely and effective disaster information to grasp the opportunity of public crisis management and respond quickly, which depends not only on the information sources of crisis management function organization system and auxiliary departments, but also on the information of public departments and even the work and service of staff consultation system. Only in this way can we form a benign interaction between different roles, especially the positive role of public crisis management experts, and form a certain degree of division of labor and mutual cooperation between experts and decision makers in different crises.