Xiong Haizi was claimed 200,000 yuan for playing bad relatives. Is it really so expensive to make?
My relative Xiong Haizi destroyed about 23 offices, with a total value of more than 50,000 RMB. Should I ask them to take legal action?
Tens of thousands of hands were destroyed by relatives Xiong Haizi. Can I take legal proceedings to prosecute?
You can take legal procedures, but after taking legal procedures, the relationship between relatives may not be as good as before, which may lead to no longer contact. The "Xiong Haizi" incident quickly fermented on the Internet. Some netizens are worried that the "Xiong Haizi" incident will cause relatives to turn against each other and suggest that things be solved, but more netizens support it and support the use of legal means to safeguard my cousin's interests and feelings.
In this regard, Sun Binbin, a lawyer of Shanghai Hanshang Law Firm, said that if a minor destroys other people's property, the owner of the property certainly has the right to claim compensation from the guardian of the minor, and the amount of compensation shall be subject to the assessment. As for the lack of custody, the guardian of the minor can be used as a defense, and then the court will allocate the responsibilities of both parties in the middle.
Chen Mo, a senior consultant in the Psychological Counseling Office of East China Normal University, said that from a social point of view, the younger generation already has a profound concept of the legal system. When their interests are infringed, it is definitely a good thing to know how to protect them by law. Because when a person is dealing with very complicated things, especially when it is mixed with family, it often restricts his behavior. But for the post-90s generation, they chose the simplest and best way-resorting to the law to safeguard their own interests.
Chen Mo said that the post-90s generation will treat their families like this, and the future post-00s will deal with problems in this way more naturally. In their world, relationships will be simplified. The question is whether the older generation can understand the practice of the next generation. Zhang Qi, deputy director of the Psychological Counseling Center of East China Normal University, said in an interview that some people may not understand the significance of these things to their new cousins, and everyone has important things in his life.
For example, the cartoons deleted from the computer by this child, the headphones taken away, and the ruined hand-made ones were all accumulated by my cousin who ran around with pocket money for many years. These objects are part of her life in the past few years, accompanied by her life story. None of these losses can be made up by simple money.
Xiong Haizi was claimed 200,000 yuan for breaking relatives. Is it really so expensive to make?
First of all, I don't know what it is. I'm looking at it from the perspective of a pure passerby. The problem is definitely that the market value of this manual office is not so expensive, maybe it is heavier and more expensive in your heart. But this statement is too unkind and unreasonable. He is still a child.
No matter how expensive your toys are, they are not necessarily suitable for children. Even more valuable other treasures. In the eyes of children, anything can be a toy. In their eyes, toys worth 1 yuan are as fun as toys worth 1 10,000 yuan. Children have no ability to measure whether things are expensive or cheap. Xiong Haizi didn't play well, and the guardian has the obligation to pay compensation, but it is wrong to charge exorbitant prices. Besides, we are relatives, and we can't deny our children because of their behavior.
Also, although the guardian has the obligation to pay compensation, it seems that there is a law that stipulates that the owner is also at fault in taking care of it, just like the recent "300,000 yuan bracelet was broken". The lawyer said that the merchant should bear the main responsibility. "The merchant is not insured and should bear the main responsibility." Let's get back to this matter. The child is not a natural person with independent consciousness, and the office made by the owner by hand has no price tag and no protective measures. The parents of Xiong Haizi who are damaged by this situation will bear the responsibility of 10% at most. As the guardian of the child, he should take the initiative to show sincerity. After all, affection is priceless, and attitude is priceless. It may be ungrateful for the owner to ask for high compensation. But after all, it is our children's fault first, and we should be humble and reassure our loved ones. In order to maintain family ties, we should take the initiative to make up for it.
Xiong Haizi's behavior will cause many troubles to parents and others. Parents should reflect on their education. This kind of thing also tests the moral bottom line Family affection is priceless, and it is done and cherished.
My relative Xiong Haizi destroyed about 23 offices, with a total value of more than 50,000 RMB. Should I ask them to take legal action?
If the other party is willing to pay compensation and apologize, it is better not to go to court. After all, relatives have a fight. If you refuse to pay compensation or the compensation is unreasonable, you can go to court, but it is still not recommended. It is said that 23 yuan is more than 5w, with an average of more than 2000 yuan. What did you buy? Soldiers?
The introduction of Xiong Haizi holding a lawsuit and Xiong Haizi holding a crime of destroying relatives' homes ends here. I wonder if you have found the answer you need from it? If you want to know more.