During the epidemic, villages and roads all over the country were closed, so I couldn't go out. At home these days, it's not as comfortable as reading in class. Today, I prepared some reading strategies during the review period, hoping to help you!
No. 1
trailbreaker
Its key daily tasks are to read articles attentively, think deeply and generally, and consult relevant materials anytime and anywhere.
After studying hard, you should sum up all the learning contents of the current page and write them in the top margin of each book. Then, according to such questions, ask them one by one (without reading a book), and you can respond, even if it is well-founded;
If you can't respond, go back and read the article carefully until you can describe it in detail, accurately and fluently in your own language without reading.
second
Review scanner
Review what you learned the day before, that is, what you scanned in the first step.
According to the memory curve of the famous French sociologist's forgetting curve, people's forgetting speed is fast first and then slow, so if you can review it immediately, that is to say, you can push what you have learned in a little time without forgetting the raw materials you have learned.
I don't know that many learners can't allocate time immediately to review what they have learned. As a result, they have completely forgotten what they learned until they want to review it. Therefore, they have to spend the same or even several times the original time to study again (only a little time), which is very time-consuming and uneconomical.
In addition, when reviewing from the second step, you must read the questions listed in the first study, and you don't have to read the full text immediately. For the listed questions, try to recall the calculation basis that can be answered in detail, accurately and smoothly. If you can't read the book carefully, mark the relative problems. gd.yd 1 19.cn
Trying to recall is a more active whole process than reading an article. It requires people's brains to be more active in thematic activities, and it is also a whole process of self-examination and self-supervision, so that people can concentrate on grasping the parts they can't remember or correcting the inaccuracies in their memories, so it is the key way to improve their learning initiative and efficiency.
When answering questions, try to use your own language. Because you can reproduce them in your own words, you will improve your understanding of raw materials. Raw materials that are not well understood are generally associated with "other people's" language methods, while raw materials that are well understood are easily translated into "their own language".
third place
Sort out and summarize the topic
The content of the third review should be what you learned a week ago. In addition to the program flow completely consistent with the second step, in the review work of the third step, we should also pay attention to combing and summarizing the contents learned in one link.
Generally speaking, according to their hobbies and understanding of raw materials, that is to say, the raw materials that are most expected to "go in and out at will" in the depths of memory. The premise of raw material production and processing is analysis, comprehensiveness and understanding. Writing an outline is a logical memory method of vocabulary, because it transforms the language mode of "others" into "own language" according to active intuitive thinking.
fourth
Review and inspection
The interval between the fourth step and the third step is long, which is to review and check what you learned a month ago.
Generally speaking, after the first three rounds of study and review, most of the contents should have been mastered skillfully and accurately. If there are some unfamiliar and incorrect places at this time, you should be more vigilant, be waterproof and leak-proof, and mark them well, so as to remind yourself to pay special attention during the review session and the final review.
In other words, Bian Xiao should talk about the key content of review methods. Generally speaking, it has the following self-evident advantages:
First, down-to-earth, make people feel stable and sexy, and prevent impatience, depression, inability to learn, inattention and many other bad learning psychological states.
Second, it saves time and effort, has high efficiency and effectively develops the economy. This method is effective in allocating study review intervals, which takes much less time than four rounds of review, but far exceeds the actual effect of four rounds of independent review. As mentioned above, after a round of review, due to the long time interval from the first study, review usually becomes learning again.
Third, regulatory feedback is natural. According to the way of asking questions and trying to recall, we can grasp which parts have been used flexibly and which parts have not. Then, for the unskilled part, concentrate on fighting annihilation, which not only saves time, but also ensures the quality of learning.