How about Hangzhou Lezu Asset Management Co., Ltd.?

A company with no credibility deceives customers under the guise of public housing network. At present, I feel that I have suffered serious losses due to poor management. I signed a five-year entrustment management contract with them about a year ago, and always thought it was a public housing network. They all work in the stores of public housing network. The furniture promised at the beginning has not been in place yet. Just recently, I said that the contract could not be continued because of poor management. Unilateral termination of the contract. However, the issue of compensation has not been resolved. Lezu has been feeling cold in the dead mouse, saying that it is good that they don't run, and then looking for the public housing network, always admitting that it is the same company. Now when something goes wrong, we start to shirk the responsibility, saying that it is two different companies. Lezu only rents the venue of public housing network and uses brands for marketing. This is obviously prevarication. Ye, the second shareholder of Lezu, is the actual controller of the public housing network. As an established enterprise in Hangzhou, the public housing network deceives customers and is dishonest. I hope that such enterprises will withdraw from the market as soon as possible and will no longer hurt consumers. As for a company like Lezu, it has no credibility at all. If it doesn't deceive consumers by applying the popular brand, it will have no foothold in the market.