The influence of the whole West on the East has been effectively deconstructed and infiltrated from the aspects of culture, science, art, politics, logic and civilization. Einstein's physical study of optics and the appearance of nuclear magnetic resonance technology have extended quantum medicine from the field of quantum mechanics. Obviously, Heisenberg has finished Einstein's explanation of uncertainty principle in 1927 (I). The penetration of quantum mechanics brings a macro-world substance into the micro-world, which makes the influence of biological photons shine brilliantly in the UP principle. However, with the advancement of theories one by one, the laws of large and small universes and reproducible universes have been put forward, which has always made quantum mechanics enter an unexplained reality. At the end of the 20th century, at the annual meeting of physics at Cambridge University, we had given up our obstinacy in quantum mechanics and admitted our confusion in this field. Classical philosophy is easier to explain such an ending. From the whole 1 to 1/2, 1/4, 1/8,1/6, 1/32,1/.
Contemporary medicine, physiology and nutrition are inseparable from this arrangement. The Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine over the years shows the research tendency of human science. 1965, F. Jacob, J. L. Mono, A. M. Lovol (France) on the research results of enzymes and bacteria, they have made a tendency of scientific research on the micro side of the whole. The chemical synthesis of vitamins was only a vague line before 1937. 1974 A. Claude, C.R. De Dief (Belgium) and G.E. Paradi (USA) engaged in the study of cell structure and function, and made the route clear again.1979a.M. Cormac (USA) and G.N. Monsfield (USA). Obviously, the process of discovery has been going on, but unfortunately, scientific discovery is always carried out in substitution, just like the communication tools used by human beings. 1983 B. mcclintock (USA) found that mobile genes can intercept information dynamically. If the science of 1983 can be found in the static research, it will be carried out dynamically afterwards, which will speed up the process of various researches. Although the research field is aimed at physiology and medicine, physics and chemistry have inevitably merged.
Comprehensive research has been decomposed into decomposed recovery. However, all thoughts think that integration is a return to the direction in principle, so it is impossible to avoid a misunderstanding of human interference. Humans have not yet integrated any renewable energy fields. In the classical integrated thinking, I hope to adapt to the present situation as soon as possible, which is also the limitation of decomposition research.
Contemporary integration only protects the classical meaning of integration, but these meanings are constantly being questioned. When Confucius thought is the way to save the future civilization, it is obviously only a very classic integrated thinking rather than energy discovery. This is the essential reason why it has not been widely recognized. However, the reality is that the scientific researchers of our past dynasties have played the role of guardians because they lacked dynamic research and did not enter the comprehensive scientific field. Zhuangzi, Laozi, Mozi, Boquera Diaz, Aristotle, Socrates and others in the west all made in-depth research and discovery on integration, but all of them gave up, and Laozi finally retired with the Tao Te Ching, and never disappeared. Confucius, on the other hand, guided and confronted with a pragmatic attitude. Obviously, China in the East was successful, and the influence of The Analects of Confucius on governing the country in the Song Dynasty had already appeared. However, relatively speaking, Aristotle's belief did not last long, and Descartes appeared to challenge the whole western system. Of course, he achieved great success, and there appeared a real monograph on anatomy and a model of modern nutrition. At the end of Qing Dynasty, China's mode began to be confused and tracked, and finally entered the real farewell era under the guidance of Lu Xun and Zhan Tianyou. The microscopic research system no longer protects the philosophy of Lao zi and Zhuang zi. However, the attempt to establish his own national philosophy system in Peking University failed, while Nan took another road and achieved real success in the classical field: he returned to the essence of classical philosophy. And not many people understand this truth.
In this integrated mode, Ge Hong of Jin Dynasty hoped to discover the mystery in the practice called chemistry by modern people. Obviously, his purpose is to have a new discussion on the definition of the world. Just like a prankster, he gave up when he found the terrible result of simple combination, but the level of decomposition was not carried out in China.
Psycholysis finally became popular in China. Later generations' research on Confucius reached the largest scope in the field of decomposition until they lost themselves. The decomposition of matter began in Descartes' time, which indicates another puzzle in the spiritual field: the more you understand, the more misunderstood and insoluble you are. But no one can stop it from changing. Nobel Prize in Literature, which started at 1900, began to disappear in the United States from 1950, while the film and television represented by the United States began to flourish. Nobel Prize in Literature began the "continental drift". Up to now, no one is surprised by the history that the United States lost Nobel Prize in Literature, because the United States has reached a height that others can't reach in the material field, and physics, chemistry, medicine and physiology have all tilted towards this country in recent years. Of course, the local people regard the Nobel Prize as an accident outside work-just an accident. Obviously, even the Nobel Organizing Committee has no insight into this trend.
In the human society with a history of about 3,000 years, the proportion of contemporary scientific and technological civilization is less than 10%, but it has ended the integration model that has been guarded for more than 2,700 years. Humans can still see some sad emotions, and Tagore of India expressed such helplessness:
There are no traces of wings in the sky/but I/have flown.
He also won the Nobel Prize in Literature. I don't know whether the Nobel Prize in Literature Organizing Committee has found his direction or felt that it has awakened an ancient integration mode, and then the literature prize will not continue this trend of thought. Perhaps, there is really no trace of wings in the sky. In the process of human civilization, the establishment of the Nobel Prize is undoubtedly an initial dream: to provide humanitarian honor and financial support for scientists who have been unable to make a living. From the beginning, Nobel's embarrassment has been inevitably announced: he has been on the road of a scientific extreme development model. Of course he doesn't know, of course he doesn't know, because he is just an explosive and rich science enthusiast. He chose this decision when the will brought by the end of his life could not be legally inherited by anyone. Is it God's intention or his own lack of wisdom? There is nothing to guess. However, we can feel the great influence of the Nobel Prize from the flickering light and shadow of red wine. The Nobel Prize is affecting the trend of the whole scientific community, and the establishment of literature is a prediction in the spiritual field, while other physiology, medicine and physical chemistry are predictions in the material field, which makes human beings touch their senses to think about whether it is fair in various awards: this is just entertainment, although developed countries all know this effect, it does not affect their scientists to explore monographs in their own fields. Obviously, China has the greatest influence. China's special history and huge talent resources have not brought such influence in this research field, which obviously makes Chinese people prone to many emotional reactions, but only emotions. The Nobel Prize is interpreted as a kind of morbid emotional therapy in China. I don't know whether this emotional reaction is intentional or unintentional, but it is already boiling.
A professor at Oxford University first expressed his views on this phenomenon. He thinks that the direction of science has an unpredictable tendency. He believes that the so-called "experts" are people who master research more and more professionally and meticulously in their own research fields. The more details you have in depth of field, the more digital the effect will be. The trend of digitalization has always been the current scientific trend. Of course, the setting of the Nobel Prize also takes into account such a reality. The organizing committee has no way to influence the research direction, because everything has already started in Descartes' time. This kind of embarrassment is not without it. What is particularly alarming is that such scientists have gradually been unable to cross in a single field. A new kind of stubbornness or paranoia has been formed. It is obvious that computer expert andy grove, the founder, former president and CEO of Intel, told the truth. Under the influence of computers, human scientific research inevitably produces a large number of paranoia. Computers are constantly updated in the hands of such people, from 386, 486, 586, 686, and constantly upgraded, and people are particularly nervous. Faced with such detailed competition, scientific research began to affect human life. Obviously, the business community is more willing to say that details determine success or failure. However, scientists have no way out in details. Such a structure is constantly consuming energy and resources, and the foundation supporting these resources is constantly upgrading. Human e-waste is also extremely complicated.
Obviously, the results of genes can better discover the happy life of human beings, but the results are the opposite. Genes have become one of the reasons why science absorbs all kinds of resources. Before adapting to this achievement, we already knew why Zhuangzi expressed the feeling of "knowing the joy of fish". In the history of the Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine, the achievement of decomposed thinking almost reached the first place in the proportion of left and right prizes. And this trend is an irresistible trend of Nobel Prize institutions. Obviously, in 2005, Australian scientists Barry Marshall and Robin Warren discovered Helicobacter pylori and its mechanism of causing gastritis, gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. It is a congratulation after a lapse of 20 years, and it also reflects the experience of the organizing Committee. This whole is still a simple return, and the return is not bad. Obviously, genes are naive in the face of such research: genes do not affect human health that much. However, in the face of this trend, China has been at the forefront of scientific speculation, and the rise of genetic testing is a trend of speculation. No one can understand the nature of this result, but no one likes the question. And these people who grew up under the influence of Descartes certainly like it.
Looking at the photos of Nobel Prize-winning scientists, they are more like naughty children than expressions that give more other meanings. However, our fanaticism lingers in the confused state of overall protection and decomposition. Such an attitude can easily bring too much burden and unnecessary confusion. If this is just a game, then the game itself is a kind of entertainment, and we obviously lack such a mentality as a whole.
However, it is undeniable that despite such deep influence, we still regret that we can't see the direction of science and become more and more confused. At least American nutritionists are complaining that they are getting confused.
The setting of the Nobel Prize is inseparable from the result that the more regrets we have, the more we have to maintain it. But if we don't, what can we do? Contemporary nutrition has been divided into social nutrition, life nutrition, genetic nutrition, physical nutrition, molecular nutrition, policy nutrition, cultural nutrition, functional nutrition, classic nutrition (traditional Chinese medicine), clinical nutrition and other fields, but many divisions are meaningless, but without such divisions, we will be lost, so we would rather be meaningless and need a kind of guidance. The trend of contemporary nutrition, starting from the field of nutrients, declared the end of an era, but the appearance of nutrients surprised science because it was beyond the scope of decomposition thinking. At present, the practice of purifying traditional Chinese medicine has not really succeeded, and local changes have not yet become a law theorem. The Nobel Prize has aroused doubts and worries about personal experimental behavior and clinical behavior: they would rather send the Nobel Prize to a newly appointed American president than take a stand in the field of life science easily, because maybe this direction is right, maybe it is a big joke, but our discovery is a joke.
It is considered that the trend of nutrients is also the trend of non-nutrients field, which is obviously a waste of resources. Although there are new achievements, the emergence of anti-nutrients is hard to find. The mastery of modern nutrition is not under the decomposition thinking. If we continue the original trend, we will eventually get lost instead of being found. Of course, if it is considered discovery, it is called corrective behavior discovery. That's all.
From the study of energy release, nutrition has aroused great interest in the field of nutrients, and it is considered that three energy nutrients, almost the core, are being made into a standard to measure a life and health. Since 2000, we have clearly found this trend in the revision of food energy requirements in the United States and China.
But no one realizes that this trend is a very dangerous choice. At least we can't praise it so much. We constantly promote information-based software behavior, which actually deepens Descartes' decomposition thinking. And such behavior can't bring any benefits to the development of nutrition. The discovery of nutrients is Nobel Prize's favorite place, but not many can be found, because even the ancient taboo ingredients, Nobel Prize certainly does not want to see such an ending. However, it is a common phenomenon that non-nutrient and anti-nutrient fields cannot be found with the current mechanization behavior. No one dares to admit that even the discovery of solids, liquids, gases, crystals and the fifth structure is still a doubtful trend. The Nobel Committee firmly adheres to a stable auditing rule. Obviously, the results of nutrients will be difficult to go beyond such attention and audit, and it is destined to start from the spiritual field.
The outlet of contemporary nutrition should choose to change from material thinking to ideological structure in spiritual field, from the discovery of single elements to the study of overall model, and from the discovery of materials to the thinking of combined materials.