The official account of WeChat, "She Magazine", was sued by Zhou Dongyu for compensation, but it was reduced to 6,543,800+0.2 million after the settlement between the two parties. What is the reason?

Bian Xiao paid attention to this matter because he read an article entitled "I praised Zhou Dongyu for her good clothes, but she asked me to pay 500,000 yuan". Why? She publishes? Published many articles using about 70 photos of Zhou Dongyu, and was asked by Zhou Dongyu Studio to delete the posts and sued for compensation of 500,000 yuan. Bian Xiao was surprised to see this article. Now there are more and more media, and many photos of stars will be used in the pictures. What about this time? She publishes? Why did Zhou Dongyu Studio claim it? Let's find out why.

Article 100 of the General Principles of Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that citizens have the right to portrait, and their portraits shall not be used for profit without their consent. ? She publishes? Is a self-media author, and the account subject is registered by a limited company. Since the subject is registered by the company, it must be for profit. As far as this article is concerned, it is reasonable and legal for Zhou Dongyu Studio to sue 500,000 yuan.

Even if? She publishes? I've always stressed that the whole article is praising Zhou Dongyu. I don't sell clothes, slimming products and have no commercial use. Take Zhou Dongyu as an example? She publishes? Fans and everyone's role models and idols, but there is no denying it? She publishes? It has always been a business operation model. She published YEATION under her banner and published some articles of stars, which is one of the ways to attract netizens to pay attention to the author from the media and other industries under her banner. This is the fan effect, and it is also a way for the author to commercialize the media.

She publishes? After mediation with Zhou Dongyu Studio, the previously published article about Zhou Dongyu has been deleted, and the current compensation amount has been reduced from 500,000 to120,000. The two sides have reached an agreement. From this incident, we can see that everyone attaches importance to the right to portrait. Since media authors use celebrity pictures again, they must obtain their consent and authorization.