Therefore, the focus of our debate should be the advantages and disadvantages of chalk, which is worth learning and needs chalk to improve itself. But I read most people's replies. Is it related to this topic? Some respondents claimed to be public examination training teachers, but there was no logic to argue at all. You teach common sense?
In fact, the benefits of chalk are very simple. First, it is an indisputable fact that the price is close to the people. Perhaps the people debating here have now entered the local tyrants' class and passed that short-lived era, but I can still remember that when I took the public exam, I really didn't want to spend thousands of dollars on the training class. Second, it has contributed to the fairness of the public examination to a certain extent. The unfair thing in this world may be that I am a poor college student and ashamed to ask my parents for thousands of dollars in training fees. I can only spend tens of dollars on Taobao to buy textbooks that have been published in China for five or six years but have not been revised. And Oba, the red foreman of the next class, has tens of thousands of dollars and has no psychological burden.
The third point is the convenience of time. Those who say how good the map of China is must be studying full-time. According to my limited understanding, at least in small and medium-sized cities, Chinese painting classes are mostly continuous, and there are few classes on weekends, especially at night. On-the-job candidates have to ask for leave if they want to apply for classes. Chalk is different. As long as you have time in the evening and weekend, you won't delay your study, will you? Fourth, learning efficiency is higher. Students who sign up for offline courses will buy a recording pen in advance if they are a little concerned. Why?
What you don't understand in class can be reviewed after class. In fact, the instant acceptance of the knowledge involved in the public examination is relatively poor. If you say that you have attended a class once, you will try your best to do the problem. I can only say, why don't you come into my office? Therefore, if you want to really improve, you need to do problems in class and then come back to class to check for leaks. However, the chalk live class can be replayed. Isn't this worthy of reflection by other institutions? Fifth, quality education resources are concentrated. This is clear to everyone. The national examination is basically once, and hundreds of prefecture-level cities across the country start classes at the same time after work. No one can have so many excellent teachers.