The agent took me to see the house, and when I went out, I saw a rental at the door of the community. I called to ask, which happened to be the one introduced by the intermediary. Is this a jump comma

The agent took me to see the house, and when I went out, I saw a rental at the door of the community. I called to ask, which happened to be the one introduced by the intermediary. Is this a jump command? Skipping orders usually means that in real estate transactions, buyers or tenants bypass the intermediary and reach a deal directly with the seller or landlord after learning the housing information through the intermediary to avoid paying the intermediary fee. In your case, if you don't know the information of this property through other channels before the agent shows you the house, but only through the introduction of the agent, then you can contact the landlord directly and reach a lease agreement, which can be regarded as a jump order in theory, because it may harm the interests of the agent.

But whether it constitutes a jump order depends on the specific agreement between you and the intermediary. If you have signed a written agreement with the intermediary that you can't bypass the intermediary and deal directly with the landlord within a certain period of time, then your behavior may have violated the agreement. If there is no such agreement, or the intermediary does not provide enough services (such as providing a contact information without substantive intermediary services), then your direct contact with the landlord may not constitute a jump order.

In practice, in order to avoid disputes, it is best to communicate clearly with the intermediary and understand the rights and obligations of both parties. If you decide to deal directly with the landlord, you should also consider the inconvenience that may be brought to the intermediary and properly handle the relationship with the intermediary. If in doubt, you can consult a legal professional to ensure that your actions are legal and compliant.