Classic case article of false advertisement in real estate 1
From June 2065438 to February 2002, Ms. Cao was going to buy a commercial house from a developer. At that time, the developer advertised to pay a deposit of 55,000 yuan within the agreed time: June 2065,438+February 20021-June 65,438+February 29 * *. After Ms. Cao paid a deposit of 55,000 yuan, the developer said that if it was a provident fund, it could not enjoy a 9.9% discount, so the two sides were deadlocked.
Ms. Cao thinks that the developer didn't tell the provident fund that she couldn't enjoy the discount, and asked to return the house and return the deposit of 55,000 yuan. The developer thinks that the deposit that has been delivered cannot be refunded, so the deposit is not refundable.
Later, Ms. Cao complained to Jiulongpo District Industrial and Commercial Branch 123 15, demanding preferential activities or a refund. Finally, under the mediation of the Industrial and Commercial Branch, the two sides reached an agreement, and the developer promised to refund the consumer deposit of 55,000 yuan.
Classic case of false advertising in real estate II
20 12 in may, the owner representative of a real estate in Banan district complained that the greening rate of the real estate was 4 1%, and according to the publicity map of the real estate, the community parks and sports fields were planned in the neighborhood next to buildings 30 and 32, but there was no greening when the house was handed over, and the greening could not reach 4 1% at all, which perfunctory the owners.
Later, the relevant departments said that the planning and design of the property was based on the relevant construction laws, regulations and standards for the design and construction of greening indicators and supporting facilities. The plot on the east side of Buildings 30 and 32 in the residential area is planned green space. Because the high-voltage tower in the plot has not been relocated, the green space and sports ground in the green space have not been implemented.
Classic case of false advertising in real estate 3
Siwei Industrial and Commercial Office of Jiang 'an Branch of Wuhan Administration for Industry and Commerce received a report, and the informant reported that the "Bund Sanyang Jincheng" property located at the intersection of Jinghan Avenue and Sanyang Road had a huge advertisement of "90,000 down payment for three rooms". From the price point of view, the down payment is 90,000, and the maximum payment is 400,000-500,000. And there are three rooms, and the cost performance is very attractive. So he specially prepared 90,000 yuan to buy a house. Who knows that this kind of house is actually only 40 square meters, with one room and one living room. The so-called "three rooms" is just a reference design scheme of "mini three rooms, functional partition" provided by developers. After receiving the report, the industrial and commercial department immediately conducted an investigation. After investigation, Wuju Ji Yan, a customer of Wuhan Jinfa Real Estate Co., Ltd., explained in writing to the industrial and commercial department that the product was a small apartment with a size of 40.36 square meters, originally designed as one bedroom and one living room, and provided the customer with a mini three-bedroom decoration scheme for their reference. The starting price of this apartment is 1 1 149 yuan/square meter, which is equivalent to a total price of 450,000 yuan.
Classic case of false advertising in real estate 4
In July 2000, the owner Yao took a fancy to a house with a total price of more than 700,000 yuan 140 square meter in a downtown area. At that time, there was such a description in the architectural book of Shi Sheng Jiayuan: "It is a luxury to build a central garden of nearly 6,000 square meters with one inch of land in the city center. Shi Sheng Jiayuan City Apartment has such luxury. " It can be said that this promotional text was one of the important reasons that prompted Yao to place an order at that time. Before signing the contract, Yao also specially asked the sales girl to verify whether the "6,000 square meters central garden" was true. The sales girl said that if there is something in the loushu, there will be no fake.
In June 2002, after Yao got the house, he found that the original 6,000 square meters central garden promised by the developer was actually less than 2,000 square meters. According to the developer's explanation, the land acquisition area of Shi Sheng Jiayuan is 1 1 ,000 square meters. Subtract more than 5000 square meters of building area and road area, and the rest is the garden area. Due to the sharp decrease in the area of public green space, Jiayuan owner Yao and others decided to apply to the Municipal Arbitration Commission for arbitration, demanding compensation from the developer.
Classic case of false advertising in real estate 5
An advertisement of a real estate in Chengdu was complained by buyers because of the advertisement of "only 20 minutes' drive from Tianfu Square". The complainant, Ms. He, said that it was dizzying for developers to advertise in the media such as "only 20 minutes' drive from Tianfu Square", "Top 10 Most Growing Real Estate Enterprises in China" and "First-class Water-friendly Community". After advertising that he was a developer, he went to the sales office and paid a down payment for a house.
However, after calming down and thinking carefully, Ms. He discovered that "only 20 minutes' drive from Tianfu Square" is the ideal state when the car is driving at a constant speed of 60 kilometers per hour, and it is impossible to stop halfway. If you drive yourself, you may not be able to get there in half an hour; The "Top Ten Most Growing Real Estate Enterprises in China" did not know where it came from. In short, it was not approved by the competent department of * * *; " "First-class hydrophilic community" is also an irregular statement. You say first-class is first-class, and we don't know what first-class is. "Ms. He questioned.
After Ms. He complained to the industrial and commercial department, the developer was ordered by the industrial and commercial department to stop publishing the above advertisements.
Classic case of false advertising in real estate 6
From September 2008 to April 2009 and from March to June 2009, two real estate companies in Wenzhou published advertisements in major newspapers, television and other media in Wenzhou that exaggerated or even misinterpreted the actual effect of the property. These advertisements include "Fiona Fang 13 square kilometer, which is twice the area of the West Lake and the largest urban green lung in the southeast coast", "178 square meter short board with a 9-meter-deep structure, and a scarce pattern with five sides facing south", "13 square kilometer National Sanyang Wetland Park" and "7,000 square meter project, with a cost of nearly 100 million yuan.
The relevant person in charge of Wenzhou ouhai district Administration for Industry and Commerce said that this kind of advertisement violated the relevant provisions of Article 37 of People's Republic of China (PRC) Advertising Law, and was ordered to stop publishing, and publicly corrected and eliminated the influence within the corresponding scope at the same advertising cost, and was punished by1120,000 yuan and 880,000 yuan * * respectively.
Classic case of false advertising in real estate On July 2 1, law enforcement officers of Meiyuan Industrial and Commercial Office of Jinjiang Industrial and Commercial Bureau were handling the case. Advertisements such as "Jinjiang's first real estate model house, community 1000㎡ health runway, Jinjiang's first sunken plaza and clubhouse, and ThyssenKrupp elevator, the world's first brand" were found in the postcard-style printed advertisement published by a real estate company in Jinjiang and eight printed advertisements published by the company in Xucuo community, Meiling Street, Jinjiang, and the parties were unable to provide on-site information.