If you know the history of automobile discovery, you will know that human beings invented the automobile first, then the tram, and finally the tanker.
/kloc-cars have been running on the road for more than 0/00 years, but it is too troublesome to use. Therefore, after the appearance of trams, they once sold well because they were more convenient than cars.
But charging can only be one or two hundred kilometers at a time, and the charging speed is not as fast as refueling. Therefore, the latest tanker came from behind, surpassing cars and trams and becoming the mainstream.
The reason why trams were eliminated a hundred years ago still exists today. Although the cruising range has improved and the charging speed has improved a lot, it is still too inferior to the oil car. Therefore, trams are no problem as a daily means of transportation, but as road trip, it is embarrassing.
You may say that most people buy cars as daily transportation, while go on road trip is only a minority. Yes, that's why some people can accept trams. But for big cities, the development direction of daily travel is definitely rail transit. In the future, like Japan and many European countries today, we will encourage commuting by bus in various ways. The most important value of private cars is reflected in holidays.
Fortunately, just imagine that there is no such policy. If there is such a policy, it will directly cause an "earthquake-like" car market effect, and many once brilliant car companies will collapse and disappear in the earthquake. I actually sang A Xin's "If" unconsciously. It is not good news to cancel the ban on the sale of fuel vehicles nationwide. Why? Listening and phase analysis one and two.
First, the national abolition of fuel vehicles will lead to serious environmental pollution. This is not an alarmist. Although new energy vehicles run on the road, it seems that there is no emission problem, but the power source is a big problem. At present, thermal power generation accounts for about 75% of the total electricity. If all new energy vehicles are used, that is, more than 654.38 billion private cars and nearly 300 million motor vehicles will be charged. What kind of power grid can withstand? How much power is needed to support it? How much coal does it take to produce this kind of electricity? I'm afraid there will be smoke and darkness, just to charge everyone's car for a while.
Second, the road system may be paralyzed. There are electric cars all over the street, which is more likely caused by lack of electricity, and the number of charging piles is small. There are long queues in front of each charging pile, all of which are people waiting for charging ... People's travel can't be guaranteed, the pace of life is disrupted, and the whole society is in a state of chaos.
Third, traditional fuel vehicle companies have not integrated and docked pure electric vehicles, and it may only be a matter of minutes to be eliminated. New energy vehicles cannot be mass-produced, enterprises have no profits, and the laid-off rate of employees has greatly increased. Enterprises can only go bankrupt or be acquired by electric vehicle companies. For companies that have invested in new energy vehicles for a long time, they may be secretly happy, because this is an opportunity to rise. They are early in contact with new energy vehicles and have obvious advantages. They have technical reserves, R&D team, operation and reliable after-sales service. Under the hurricane of policy, it is not impossible to take off directly.
Conclusion: This is only a hypothesis. This assumption is impossible at present. Even if such a decision is made, it will cause social chaos. With the passage of time and the progress of science and technology, these problems have been overcome little by little. Maybe after 50, these problems don't exist at all.