Nana was sued. As can be seen from the details of the court announcement issued by Weibo, the Shanghai Film and Television Culture Studio was in Nana, and a pharmaceutical company and a yeast company were also listed as defendants. The plaintiff was Fan, and the case was a "sales contract dispute". On the afternoon of the 8 th, it was heard in Chengdu, Sichuan.
It is understood that Nana once served as the brand spokesperson of the above-mentioned yeast company on 20 19. Now the studio and the company are listed as defendants at the same time, which immediately triggered speculation from all walks of life about whether it is related to product quality, and then there was a contract dispute. In this regard, her studio did not make a sound before the deadline. Some media called the yeast company, but it was also unexpected that they failed to get a reply.
In fact, Hunan Satellite TV reported the host controversy this year. Qian Feng, the host of Everyday Up, was accused of sexually assaulting a woman in her twenties, and the TV station immediately announced the dissolution of the cooperation relationship. Li, the host of Happy Camp, endorsed a tea company, and the company later ran away, resulting in the loss of franchisees' rights and interests, so the group went to him for justice. Now Nana, another host of the program, was sued in the studio, which immediately triggered the follow-up trend from all walks of life.
Why did Nana Studio become the defendant of the sales contract dispute? Some netizens also asked, this is a product quality problem. Why is it a sales contract dispute? Should the reasons for choosing the dispute over the sales contract be brought to Nana Studio? Why is it under the jurisdiction of the railway transport court? The following will be answered by French Open lawyers.
According to the inquired information, in 20 19, Nana became the spokesperson of Angel Newt yeast protein powder and probiotic (SC) series products under Angel Yeast. Therefore, lawyer Wenfa.com speculates that the legal basis for suing Nana Studio may be the second paragraph of Article 56 of the Advertising Law, that is, if a false advertisement about a consumer's life and health goods or services causes damage to consumers, its advertising operators, publishers and spokespersons shall be jointly and severally liable with the advertisers.
Conclusion In response to the case that Nana Studio was sued for a dispute over a sales contract, Angel Yeast, a listed company, responded through "Angel Angel Angel" Weibo that the products endorsed by Ms. Nana were our brand.
The product quality is qualified and meets the relevant national safety and quality standards; Ms. Nana has fully and reasonably examined and paid attention to the products, and there are no false advertisements and false propaganda; This case has entered the judicial process, and the determination and handling of relevant facts shall be subject to the effective judgment of the court.