Positive view: Modern information society needs to read thousands of books.
Contrary view: Modern information society does not need to read thousands of books.
Description: I can't figure it out because I don't know how to choose. Should reading be broad and comprehensive, or small and precise?
Commencement date: March 2004-14
Moderator: Enlightenment: Virtual Fantasy; Opposition leader: empty fantasy.
-
Against: Rainbow smoothie (1) 04-03-1412: 20.
I don't think it is necessary, because in the modern information society, many companies want people who are proficient in their work. For example, some college students can't find jobs now, but those secondary school students have found ideal jobs. That's because secondary school students have refined jobs, and college students only have culture, but not refined jobs, so modern information society does not need to study thousands of books. I think we must study. Reading should be small and precise, but you should also learn some concise works in life.
-
Against: Snake in vest (2)
Will seek but not brave, soldiers will be fine but not many.
Reading doesn't have to break many volumes.
Digest as much as you see, which is the real highest state.
Of course, today's society needs more compound talents.
However, not everyone is born with talent for development.
It's better to be solid and step by step.
-
Pro: Never change your name (3) 04-03- 15 10:40.
Don't care much, care about incisiveness?
Just like playing cards, we need all the knowledge, good and bad, and know ourselves and ourselves. I'm studying! ! !
However, this is not easy.
-
Against: Xiangmo (4) 04-03- 17 19:08
No, because all walks of life are becoming more and more specialized, and the pace of modern life is getting faster and faster. You don't have much time to read thousands of books. Just read what is useful, and books are not the only tool to gain knowledge and recreation. There are a lot of media and entertainment now, and reading is just one of them! ! !
-
In favour: Free Bird (5) 04-03- 18 20: 16
Although we are now living in such an information-developed society, the spirit of "reading thousands of books" is still necessary. Looking at the recruitment requirements of companies of all sizes and the basic requirements of companies for employees, the spirit of innovation is very clear, and where innovation comes from is based on rich knowledge. It can be seen that reading more books is the need for our foothold and survival in this society.
-
Against: You Yi (6) 04-03- 19 18:43.
The debates these weeks are so boring!
-
Dear: Laugh at the world of mortals again (7) 04-03- 19 2 1:36
You can't be an expert without comprehensive knowledge. Modern science is relevant.
-
Against: Yuer Pavilion (8) 04-03-23 14: 19.
Of course not, because we don't have higher aspirations, we can survive and live a good life. Read so many books and know so much.
There must be very few people who have read many books. What they see and think is not what ordinary people see and think. In fact, if you can make up your mind to study thousands of books, that would be great.
Modern people, too utilitarian, how can they do such a thing in a down-to-earth manner?
Not needing or not needing means we shouldn't, but we can't.
-
Expert: Hunan (9) 04-03-24 15:27
What are these arguments? I really don't know what they are.
-
Pro: Tea flavoring (10) 04-03-2611:24
With too much social information and too many choices, people will inevitably be bored.
Knowledge is knowledge, reading is necessary, and the principle of doing things is to look at what you have learned rather than information;
Interpretation of information requires what you have learned, and of course, the grasp of information can be immediate.
-
Against: Swing BT (11) 04-04-07 20:17.
The arrival of the information age has led to the explosion of information. All the books we used to read can be found online. In the past, we only had101or less time to complete information search. We can do more things in the rest of the time. Why should we waste what we could have done in 10/ 1 time to do something equally important?
This is what I mean by getting twice the result with half the effort. Is anyone in the world willing to get twice the result with half the effort?
The answer is no! At least not smart!
-
Against: Swing BT (12) 04-04-07 20:23
If a huge problem needs a lot of books, more time and energy, then the choice of materials is limited, just like the positive side: tea adds fragrance and more information, so there are more choices. We have more choices. In the spirit of Excellence, why not? In view of the limitations of books, let's talk about carrying raw materials. For our decreasing forest, strengthening communication, protecting the environment and caring for nature in the information age means caring for our home and life!
-
Against: Swing BT (13) 04-04-07 20: 31
Compared with traditional books, e-books have incomparable advantages: in terms of resource utilization, it does not need paper, ink and so on. , is a pure environmental protection green product; In the way of distribution, there is no need for transportation and inventory, and the inventory is always sufficient; At the same time, the revision, revision and revision of e-books are easy, and there is no need for complicated processes such as publishing, proofing, output and binding. In addition, the publishing method of e-books is more practical and feasible. What is most popular with readers is the low price of e-books. Its low price stems from its low cost, because e-books do not need warehousing, wholesale through middlemen, freight, slow sales and paper printing, so their low cost can reach more than half of that of paper books.
The attraction of these advantages to the market is undoubtedly huge! Therefore, more and more publishers, IT vendors, educational institutions and so on. We will concentrate on the development of e-books, which will surely lay a good foundation for the e-book market to create a new era.
-
Against: Dongmen Tengger (14) 04-04-07 20:34
The focus of the debate is: Is it necessary to read thousands of books in the information society?
-
Pro: East Gate Tengger (15) 04-04-07 20:47
Advocating reading thousands of books does not mean not participating in the combination of theory and practice, nor does it mean opposing practice! There are still many college students who have theoretical knowledge and professional practical experience. At the same time, this experience difference between undergraduates and junior college students is not the fault of reading or not.
Only by acquiring knowledge can we distinguish the good from the bad. Without the guarantee of quantity, there is no choice.
Reading thousands of books doesn't mean how many books you read, it's just a spirit. For example, a spirit of striving for erudition, should we also oppose erudition?
-
To: Shamuhai (16) 04-09-23 09: 24
In today's highly developed information society, we have no intention of abandoning books. If so, why do we need to build so many schools? Don't go to school at all, everyone is sitting at home. But if so, the gold content of the information will be greatly reduced! I believe that human beings will also stagnate! Because there is no source of knowledge, how can we move forward? So I think the information society should still study thousands of books.
-
Expert: Dave 922 (17)
fgh fgh fh fh h g gf gh gf f gf
-
Pro: Sun Haijing (18) 04-11-0310: 55
Reading activities, which formed a good atmosphere in ancient China. There is evidence to prove that "when you read thousands of books, you write like a god" and "when you read it a hundred times, you can see what it means" ... It is not difficult to see that many ancient literati's valuable experiences are vividly written on paper and remain immortal. Until today, we believe that the experience of our ancestors is still worth learning for our future generations. However, around us, many teachers' traditional education mode is deeply rooted, and they have inherited the traditional education mode-dogma. With the continuous reform of education, because there is no successful experience (model) to refer to, they are at a loss as headless flies. Some teachers mistakenly think that their level is limited, some teachers have old tasks, and some teachers think that they are not suitable for education. These are all caused by the traditional education model. In fact, the current educational reform requires our teachers to use their brains more, let go of their hands and feet, broaden their thinking, make full use of modern advanced educational information, lead and guide students to devote themselves to the sea of books, and cultivate a group of new talents who can practice, use their brains, have practical skills and dare to innovate. So, is there a shortcut to cultivate practical new talents in the new period? We don't think there is any immortal way to go. Based on our years of practice, we should boldly carry out "reading activities".
-
Against: Guiguzi (19) 04-12-1717: 06.
I am now in the information society. I think I have to finish reading it before I can apply it to practice. Why do I have to study so much?
-
Support: Jiang Han (20) 05-03-23 19:58
"The 100-meter building starts from the foundation." If you don't study thousands of books, there will be no foundation, and the building will not be built firmly. Many prodigies in ancient and modern times have finally failed. This is a fact. Everyone who does things is reading thousands of books? Do you know the principle of bamboo tube? No complete person will never be filled with water. In other words, how can I walk if I can't climb?
-
Against: qazxswedc (21) 05-03-2714: 30.
According to statistics, if we read a book every day, regardless of the quality of reading, it will take you 27 years to break ten thousand volumes.
-
Expert: Zhu (22) 05-04-07 65438
Although it will take 27 years, if it does not take 27 years, how can there be social progress?
-
Zheng: Zongzi Zongzi (23) 05-04-08 18:30
Can a CD be a book? It's just that reading methods are different and recording methods are different.
-
Against: Cherish (24) 05-04-09 2 1:03.
I think in the information society, books can give people less and less.
-
Against: Dove Haha (25) 05-04- 15 2 1: 55.
Of course, CDs are not books ~ ~ If you say so, then our media tools are all books, so why argue? CD-ROM is only the product of the development of information technology. Although the content is similar to that of a book, its nature is still different.
-
Professor: Often.
On the other hand, many people admit the importance of reading, that is, they repeatedly emphasize the form of books. As we said, "reading thousands of books" pursues a kind of spirit. Thank you for helping us figure out the time to read so many books. Du Pu said that reading thousands of books at that time was only 300 books with 500 pages. I don't think it will take you a few years.
-
Against: OOO
Reading thousands of books is a single and closed way of seeking knowledge.
Now in the information age, we still need to stick to that
Old-fashioned learning methods?
-
Pro: the loneliness of the prodigal son
If you don't need to read thousands of books in the information age, why do students lament that books are less annoying to use?
-
Pro: the loneliness of the prodigal son
Hello, debaters, why is no one whispering?
-
Pro: the loneliness of the prodigal son
We all live in the information age. If we don't need to study in thousands of books, aren't many colleges and universities expanding their enrollment just to let more students study in thousands of books?
-
[Next Page] [Last Page]
-
[for] [against]
-
[View Bad Records] [Choose to debate next week]