Answer:
In this regard, Dai Jinhua, the founder of Beijing Jin v. Law Firm, explained that from the perspective of rights, because the house is registered in the name of Rowling's boyfriend, it has the right to dispose of the house. Although the house is purchased by both parties, if the buyer is a "bona fide third party", the boyfriend's buying and selling behavior is valid, that is, the buying and selling contract between the boyfriend and the buyer is valid and binding on both parties. In this case, Rowling can hardly go home.
Dai Jinhua said that since 1994, there has been no "de facto marriage" in China. All marriages must be registered, and only after marriage registration can there be "the same property after marriage". Therefore, although Rowling has lived with her boyfriend for more than ten years, it is not a marriage relationship. If Rowling thinks that her rights have been violated, she can ask the people's court to protect her rights within the statutory time limit and ask her boyfriend to pay part of her house payment.
Editor yang
Proofreading poplar