Under normal circumstances, being able to actively consult a lawyer for legal help and courageously sending a lawyer's letter has proved one party's confidence, and sending a lawyer's letter to the other party instead of directly appealing to the court is just for the sake of their face or more, hoping that communication and negotiation between them can solve the problem amicably. But if the other party is really thick-skinned, doesn't want to take responsibility and solve the problem, then the lawyer's letter is the final notice.
Moreover, lawyer Han can also be used as evidence of one party to a certain extent. Obviously, this kind of evidence is absolutely beneficial to one party. If the party concerned is indeed the party whose rights have been infringed, and there are all kinds of strong evidence such as lawyer's letter, then if the other party ignores it at that time, it will definitely go to court in the end. Once the other party brings him to court, there will be disputes and entanglements. Moreover, the infringer has no room for recovery, and the law will give them the fairest trial.
Some infringers are really thick-skinned, thinking that the parties have a good temper and will not really be held accountable. I thought I could escape responsibility through ignorance, but no one would tolerate hooligans forever. Before, the parties respected you because they were afraid of hurting their feelings and because they wanted to solve the problem in the simplest way. If you are really a hooligan and don't want to solve the problem, you just want to let the infringement happen, then the law will definitely give you the most severe trial.