No cheating, no domestic violence. The man divorced 3.3 million, and the property only got 28,000. How did the court decide?

Many couples choose to divorce when their marriage comes to an end. Property disputes arising from husband and wife's life belong to the common property of husband and wife. Generally, people with little property will share the property with the husband and wife, but some couples with houses, cars and certain deposits will go to court for arbitration.

There is a couple in Shanghai. The husband of 3.3 million real estate only took 28,000 in the end. Speaking of which, the husband didn't have domestic violence, nor did he cheat, but he just got this little property. Everyone was surprised. Later, after the court clarified, I understood why.

It turns out that as early as when the couple bought the wedding room after marriage, the property right registration was the name of both husband and wife, but the down payment of 1 10,000 wedding room was really contributed by the mother-in-law, and the remaining 700,000 young couples applied for provident fund loans through * * *. But two years later, due to the marital disharmony, the woman filed for divorce and divided the marital property according to law.

As for the property jointly owned by the two people after marriage, it has been verified that the current market value is 3.3 million, and there are still more than 500,000 mortgages that have not been paid off. According to their agreed share, the woman accounts for 99%, and the man only accounts for 1%, so it is a 3.3 million house, and the man can only get 28,000. According to the woman's contribution, the court accounted for more than half. If the man only gets 1%, he still has to repay the loan, which is really unfair. Finally, the court ruled that the couple divorced and the house belonged to the woman. After deducting the remaining loan, the woman has to pay the man building depreciation more than 28,000 yuan, and the remaining loan is also returned by the woman.

In this case, the court's trial was correct, taking into account the money paid by the woman on the house and ensuring that the woman's interests were not harmed. It didn't cost the man too much. The loan that should have been borne by the husband and wife was also borne by the woman, who gave the man 28,000 yuan in building depreciation. Marriage comes and goes, don't be too embarrassed, or it will be scarred in retrospect.