First, let's briefly review the whole story. On July 14, Liang disclosed his experience of renting a house for free on social platforms. In the article, she said that she was violently broken into by a male tenant in the process of taking a bath in 13, and then the male tenant refused to go out without wearing any clothes. Within seven minutes of staying, she tried to touch the beam with her hand, scaring the male tenant to make a hullabaloo about, and then she called the police.
During the police inquiry, Liang said that when the male tenant opened the door, she told someone in the house, but the male tenant still broke in. When she scolded him for letting him out, the male tenant said that Liang was seen by him and he didn't realize his mistake at all. Instead, he thought it was right to do so, and then he made an announcement casually, blacklisting the male tenants and compensating Liang.
Second, the female tenant feels that she has suffered too much when she is seen, and she will continue to blame! Because the male tenant did not cause substantial harm to Liang, the police could only educate him ideologically and fined him at most, but Liang thought that the male tenant did not realize his mistake and her bad attitude was unacceptable to him, so he subsequently investigated him.
In fact, Liang's mood is very understandable. He was very tired when he rented a house outside, and now he has encountered this bad worry. Everyone is uncomfortable, especially the attitude of male tenants, which is even more unacceptable. So it is estimated that there will be follow-up between Liang and this male tenant. After all, if she can't solve it, it won't end.
Third, the male tenant thought that he had done nothing and could not accept the punishment, so he quickly called the police and said that he was wronged. Free to see that this matter has become a hot topic, in order to save the rest of the face, we quickly issued a statement. Everyone knows that male tenants can no longer be free customers. The male tenant was unhappy at the news. He thinks he went in to dry clothes, and there is no such behavior as Liang said. Moreover, he had to move out of his current house because he was blacklisted freely. This matter has not been dealt with fairly.
Then the male tenant called the police, claiming that there was no threat to Liang. She didn't do anything real. No evidence, no videos, no witnesses. To put it bluntly, it means that the public is right, and the old woman is right, which cannot be tracked. Liang has already made a fuss. If the male tenant doesn't choose to call the police, then he will take the opportunity to invade the female tenant and record it, which is not a good thing for him.
It is estimated that considering this layer, I want to pass the buck. I think that Liang could not produce any evidence except the touch of his upper lip and lower lip, so he confidently chose to call the police. I didn't expect netizens to condemn him unilaterally. It is estimated that it will be a little difficult for him to mix in this city in the future.
Finally: this woman is brave enough to share a room with a man. This man is brave enough to openly take advantage of a girl. It is estimated that these two things will be followed up. We will wait and see with melons!