The residential property said that they had only taken over the residential area for a few years, and the house had been decorated before they took over. But at present, it is the property manager who lives in the house, but the house was not decorated by the property manager, but by Mr. Li, the owner of their antique shop downstairs. After learning about this, Ms. Li found Mr. Li. Mr. Li said that no one lived in their house and the windows were broken. When it rained, a lot of water flowed into it, causing it to flow downstairs and damaging an antique worth 4 million yuan. Mr. Li looked for the property many times, hoping to find the owner, but he couldn't get in touch, so Mr. Li renovated the house.
However, Ms. Li disagreed with Mr. Li. Ms. Li said that her house has not been renovated and the water pipes have not been connected, which may cause water seepage. And the window is broken, but there is no window at all, so it is impossible to seep downstairs again. However, Mr. Li has always stressed that his antiques have been damaged and he hopes to pay compensation. In my opinion, if Mr. Li is telling the truth, he must have let the police handle the matter from the beginning. You can go to the police to investigate Mr. Li's alarm record. In addition, Li Shufu should produce evidence that harms the interests of shareholders. If the upstairs really seeps downstairs, there should be some marks on the wall downstairs.
To sum up, I personally think that Mr. Li's statement has no factual basis, but it is true that Mr. Li wants to occupy the house. At present, the matter has been handed over to the police.
The above is my own opinion. Welcome to express your views and opinions in the comments section below.