2. The ruling of the arbitration institution is as follows: In this case, 2,000 tons of wheat ordered by the buyer were mixed with another 3,000 tons, and there is no evidence to prove that the seller designated goods belonging to different buyers. This led to the seller's later claim that the buyer's 2000 tons of wheat was completely lost. According to the legal provisions that the risk of goods does not transfer before specialization, the arbitration tribunal holds that the risk of 2000 tons of wheat has not transferred, and the seller should bear all the responsibilities for this loss.
(1), the prerequisite for the transfer of goods risk from the seller to the buyer. According to the law, the risk does not pass before the goods are designated.
I beg to differ on this point. I think the specialization of goods is very important under any trade conditions, such as this case.
4. Specialization of goods refers to the act of clearly indicating that the goods belong to the relevant contract by concluding a contract, marking the goods, submitting documents, sending a notice to the buyer or other means.