Indeed, it sounds ridiculous at first glance, but it also has its unique advantages compared with "widowed parenting". On the one hand, it avoids many couples' quarrels and contradictions about parenting, and also reduces the workload of women in most families; On the other hand, both husband and wife have reached a relatively stable and equal relationship, and there will be no situation in which one party is forced to pay and delay work and life.
Of course, no matter what kind of parenting method takes time to verify, I wonder if the sisters agree with the concept of "AA parenting"?
@ Happy Alley: Personally, I think AA parenting is very good. During pregnancy and lactation, the man is responsible for making up for all the losses of the woman. The money spent on children is half, and after breastfeeding, the time spent on children is also half. The most important thing is that neither family is in trouble, and women can have their own lives after giving birth. How nice! Of course, some people will say that such children will be psychologically traumatized in the future, but if this becomes a common situation, children will feel taken for granted and used to it.
@ Ding Er: It is only fair that women are responsible for giving birth and men are responsible for raising. Suddenly, I found that those four children were very smart. They gave birth to a child and got a car and a house. They saved a man's life all their lives, and they were not angry, unlike serving a large family in the hall like chicken feathers.
@ 中中中中中: This is the future marriage. This kind of marriage is not jealous, there is no domestic violence, there is no saying that women must take care of their children, and there is no contradiction between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law. This is fair!
@ Rainbow: This line, at least, will not restrict your freedom, nor will it lose your responsibility as a parent, but it is better to change it to a contract system. Anyone who breaks a contract is like a husband who doesn't want to go home after work. This should be severely punished. See, you're still looking for an excuse to say that you're busy at work and can't go home to take care of the children.
@ happy event: Personally, I think children are the biggest victims of this kind of parenting. Couples are more likely to take this kind of parenting as a job, but they don't want to. Then there will be more contradictions in implementation. For example, how to define that everyone can achieve real fairness, and does everyone have to change the same number of diapers? Do you make the same complementary food?
@ Huahua: Alas, marriage exists in name only. In the future, human beings will eventually be replaced by robots, completely eliminating emotions, the most unreliable thing. Can "AA parenting" be understood as "agreement parenting" or "contract parenting"?
@ Old saying goes: Is this playing house as a child? This is a big joke! If this AA system really exists, children may be more unfortunate than single-parent families. Although many marriages are facilitated by partners, we should still look for marriages that are combined because of love. As for "AA parenting", I think there is no way. When a husband and wife fall in love, they will rush to take care of their children, be willing to pay for each other, and be afraid that each other will be tired. On the other hand, if you really want to "AA parenting", then it is really meaningless to live like this.
@ 中中中中: Even if it is contract parenting, is it wrong? I think it's good. Nowadays, everyone lacks this spirit of contract in marriage. At first, they said that they would never give up, regardless of sickness and death, but they derailed the next day. Is this kind of person reliable? If the marriage is signed, you will be fined millions of liquidated damages, or go straight to prison. I see who dares to cheat!
Finally, what do sisters think of "AA parenting"? Tell me your opinion quickly!