Is there a case against Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney?

Yes According to Articles 2 and 6 of the Labor Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and Articles 47, 48 and 87 of the Labor Contract Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), with reference to Article 3 of the Regulations on Paid Annual Leave for Employees and Article 10 of the Implementation Measures for Paid Annual Leave for Enterprise Employees, Article 14 of the Regulations on Wage Payment of Enterprises in Qingdao and Article 13 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Labor Dispute Cases stipulate that the judgment is as follows: 1. It is confirmed that Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Consulting Co., Ltd. dissolved the labor contract with Li Feifei on August 1 2065438, and Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Consulting Co., Ltd. paid compensation of 36,465,438+to Li Feifei within ten days from the effective date of this judgment.

2. Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Consulting Co., Ltd. shall pay 2,795.40 yuan as overtime pay for rest days to Li Feifei within ten days from the effective date of this judgment;

3. Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Consulting Co., Ltd. shall pay Li Feifei 2065438+2007 paid annual leave salary of 2008.88 yuan within ten days from the effective date of this judgment;

4. Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Consulting Co., Ltd. shall pay Li Feifei the heatstroke prevention and cooling fee 1400 yuan from 20 16 to 20 18 within 10 days from the effective date of this judgment.

Shinan District People's Court, Qingdao City, Shandong Province

paper of civil judgment

Plaintiff: Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Consulting Co., Ltd., whose domicile is * * * * Building, Xiangjun Beili, Chaoyang District, Beijing.

Legal Representative: Li Chaojing, president.

Authorized Agent: Sun Xiaoting, female, born on 19, Han nationality, plaintiff's office clerk, living in Chaoyang District, Beijing.

Agent ad litem: Qi Yan, female, born on 19, Han nationality, living in Qingdao.

Defendant: Li Feifei, female, born on, 2009, Han nationality, living in Qingdao.

The plaintiff, Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Consulting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Company), filed a lawsuit with the Chaoyang District People's Court in Beijing because of a labor contract dispute with the defendant and refused to accept the award of Qinglao Case Zi [20 18] No.826 made by Qingdao Labor and Personnel Dispute Arbitration Commission. Later, the Chaoyang District People's Court of Beijing transferred the case to our hospital. After accepting the case, the court shall apply ordinary procedures in accordance with the law and hold a public hearing. Plaintiff Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Company entrusted agent ad litem Qi Yan and defendant Li Feifei to attend the proceedings. The case has now been closed.

Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney brought a lawsuit to our hospital: 1. It ordered Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Company not to pay Li Feifei the compensation for illegally dissolving the labor contract: 364 1 1 yuan; 2. Ordered Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Company not to pay overtime pay of 2795.40 yuan on rest days, annual paid vacation pay of 2008.88 yuan and Li Feifei heatstroke prevention and cooling fee 1400 yuan from May 23, 2065438 to August 23, 2065438. Facts and reasons:

1.20 16 On May 23rd, Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Company signed a labor contract with Li Feifei. During the existence of labor relations, Li Feifei applied for maternity allowance while knowing that maternity leave wages were paid normally, and refused to return maternity leave wages, which has seriously violated the rights and interests of Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Company and caused economic losses of Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Company. According to Article 7.5.3 of the Labor Contract, the company has the right to terminate the labor contract if the employee causes economic losses of more than 1000 yuan (inclusive) due to dereliction of duty or graft. At present, there are violations in Li Feifei that encroach on and damage the company's property and personal interests, and it is not improper for Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Company to make a decision to terminate the labor contract.

2. From June 1 day to June 15, 2065438, Li Feifei had finished her annual leave. According to the regulations of attendance and leave management system of Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Company, overtime and leave should be submitted and approved through OA system, but Li Feifei did not provide the corresponding leave process.

3. The domicile of Nuoyuan Pratt & Whitney Company is in Beijing, and the employee benefits shall be implemented according to the regulations of Beijing. Since there is no welfare subsidy fee for non-high temperature workers in Beijing, heatstroke prevention and cooling fees should not be paid. To sum up, I hope the court will make a judgment as required.