Immunize their children. However, I think the question is not whether they should
Immune, but as members of society, whether they have the right not to do so.
Preventive drugs have proved to be the most effective reduction.
The incidence of fatal childhood diseases. As a result of widespread dissemination
Many lives have been saved in our society.
The disease has been reduced to almost zero.
In previous centuries, children died of common diseases, such as
Influenza and tuberculosis, because few people are immune to these diseases.
Easy to spread. Diseases such as dysentery are the result of poor sanitation.
Since the arrival of good sanitation and cleanliness, these have long been eradicated.
Water. No one will advise us to change this good practice now.
Because dysentery has been eliminated.
Serious diseases such as polio and smallpox have also been eradicated.
Adoption of the national immunization plan. Therefore, children who are not vaccinated
In this disease-free society, the risk is much smaller than in other cases.
Parents choose not to be immunized based on the fact that the disease has
Has been eradicated. If the number of parents who choose not to be immunized
Increase, the risk of disease will increase similarly.
Come back.
Immunization doesn't only affect people like seat belts.
Personal. The decision not to immunize will have a wide impact on the following people.
For this reason, I don't believe that individuals have it.
The right to step aside. In my opinion, immunization should be compulsory.