How to accurately improve the language comprehension ability of civil servants' exams?

Speech comprehension seems subjective, but it is not. Like other test questions, it is also an objective and rational question, otherwise a thousand readers will have a Hamlet, and there is no controversial question at all. Because speech comprehension questions are also objective questions, there are reasons for choosing and not choosing, which we call a breakthrough. This is mainly to fill in the blanks logically. Under normal circumstances, there are several gaps and there are several breakthroughs. The more breakthroughs, the easier it is to solve the problem.

Of course, many times, a breakthrough can make us work out the whole problem, which mainly depends on the difficulty level set by the questioner. Sometimes the questioner just sets a particularly suitable word in the wrong option to lure you into falling for it. Everyone must be more careful and think twice before you act.

Usually, several blank options should be considered comprehensively to make a more balanced choice. What you must pay attention to here is to adhere to one principle, that is, one-vote veto. If one word in this option is obviously wrong, then even if the remaining words are suitable, they should be discarded mercilessly. A good habit is to draw a big cross without hesitation in this situation. Because many people hesitate, forget their initial judgment, and are at a loss by the options set by the questioner, and finally turn around and step on the thunder that they first ruled out.

The proposer will leave a choice basis in each speech comprehension question, which is the "breakthrough" we emphasized before. Although it is particularly obscure, it will leave you a clue. So don't just do a lot of problems. Finish the question and answer correctly or not. It is important to study the problem and see where and why you are wrong, especially what the questioner is thinking and doing. Moreover, even if you choose the right one, you should know whether you are right or wrong (often it is actually wrong). Let's see what the right option looks like and what kind of wrong option it belongs to.

To reach this level, students should eat, squeeze and chew a piece of paper thoroughly, instead of being greedy. At first, I did four or five sets of problem analysis, and then I continued to do several sets. Finally, we should keep the level of 20 questions, two or three mistakes and five or six logical gaps. Always remember that every question should output the basis and reasons. Only by convincing yourself can you convince others. As long as you keep practicing, you will be able to find out the proposer's ideas, the problem-setting routines, the setting of interference options and so on. At that time, when you look at the speech comprehension questions, you can see at a glance where the doorway and mystery are, just like wearing a lens.