1. 1 for civil litigation cases that do not involve property relations, the charging standard is 4,000 yuan/piece, with the maximum floating range not exceeding 50%, and the floating range is unlimited. 2. If the property relationship is involved, the fees shall be accumulated in proportion to the amount of the subject matter of the lawsuit (dispute): (1) 4%-5% for the part below 65438+ 10,000 yuan (including 65438+10,000 yuan), and 2,000 yuan for each part less than 2,000 yuan; (2) 3% to 4% of 654.38+10,000 yuan to 500,000 yuan (including 500,000 yuan); (3) 500,000 yuan to 6.5438+0,000 yuan (including 6.5438+0,000 yuan) is 2%-3%; (4) 1 10,000 yuan to 5 million yuan (inclusive) is1%-2%; (5) 0.5% to 6.5438+million yuan (including 6.5438+million yuan); (6) The amount of RMB 6,543,800+million, with the maximum amount not exceeding 0.5%, shall be determined by both parties through consultation. Two, the agency of administrative litigation cases and state compensation cases, administrative litigation cases and state compensation cases, referring to the agency of civil litigation cases. 3. Acting in criminal cases 1. To provide legal advice to criminal suspects in criminal cases, and the benchmark charging standard is 300 yuan/time; 2. Acting as an agent for complaints and accusations, the benchmark fee is 4,000 yuan/piece; 3. The benchmark fee for being the defendant's defender or private prosecutor or the victim's litigation agent: (1) 4,000 yuan/piece in the investigation stage (including applying for bail pending trial); (2) 4,000 yuan/piece in the stage of review and prosecution; (3) The trial (first instance) stage is 5,000 yuan. If the first and second trials are handled, the second trial will be reduced according to the standard of first instance. The above-mentioned charging standards shall not go up by more than 50%, and there is no limit to the downward movement. Four. Acting for all kinds of litigation cases. The benchmark charging standard for all kinds of litigation cases is 4000 yuan/piece, and the fluctuation does not exceed 50%. Five, agent group crime and other major complex criminal cases, because of the high difficulty and large geographical span, the specific charging standard can be determined within the range of not more than five times the benchmark price. Six, about the market-regulated price charging standards The fees for lawyer services other than the above-mentioned charging items and charging standards shall be subject to market-regulated prices, and the law firm shall formulate its own charging standards according to the situation of the firm, report them to the local price and judicial departments for the record, and publish the charging items and charging standards before implementation.
Legal objectivity:
Measures for the Administration of Judicial Appraisal Fees Article 8 The judicial appraisal fees involved in property cases shall be collected cumulatively in sections according to the smaller value of the litigation object and the appraisal object. The specific proportions are as follows: (1) If it does not exceed 654.38+10,000 yuan, it shall be implemented in accordance with the charging standards listed in the annex to these Measures; (two) more than 654.38 million yuan to 500 thousand yuan, according to 1%; (three) the part of more than 500 thousand yuan to 6.5438+0 million yuan, according to 0.8%; (four) the part of 6.5438+0 million yuan to more than 2 million yuan, according to 0.6%; (five) more than 2 million yuan to 5 million yuan, according to 0.4% levy; (six) more than 5 million yuan to 6.5438 million yuan, according to 0.2%; (seven) more than 6.5438 million yuan, according to 0. 1%. For the large amount of the subject matter, the provincial price department in conjunction with the judicial administrative department at the same level may formulate the upper limit of the amount of the judicial appraisal fee according to the local actual situation. The charges for judicial expertise in property-related cases mentioned in the first paragraph of this article are only applicable to the identification of material evidence documents in judicial expertise and fingerprint identification in trace identification, and are not applicable to other appraisals.