Undoubtedly, the public is most concerned about whether the source of the money for purchasing these properties in Gong Aiai is legal, and the relevant departments should try their best to trace it and give the public a conclusion. At the same time, people need to pay more attention? Sister Fang? The resulting soil. It is in this soil that if you really dig deep, I am afraid there will be more hidden? Gong Aiai? .
Sister Fang? The soil produced, on the one hand, is the mechanism of wealth production. In the transitional period, due to the imperfection of relevant systems, the formation and accumulation of wealth presents some unique characteristics. For example, resource elements are nominally owned by the whole people, but in essence their income rights are shared by a few people. If public resources are occupied by a few people such as individual departments, localities and even industries, it will inevitably bring serious social injustice.
Sister Fang? The starting point of the company is directly related to the serious lack of reasonable income mechanism of public resources. As an ordinary person, it is almost impossible to legally acquire the property of 9666.6 square meters in Beijing. Gong Aiai's way is to obtain excess income by sharing public resources.
According to related reports, part of Gong Aiai's wealth has expanded with the wealth of Shenmu. Shenmu under the change of global energy pattern takes black gold as coal resource. The time when Gong Aiai became vice president coincided with the time when his brother Gong Zisheng began to spend huge sums of money to control Daqianyao Coal Mine. The huge profits brought by the rapid rise in coal prices cannot be transformed into national wealth through effective mechanisms, but they have made a group of people like Fang Jie rich. Such wealth accumulation is not only difficult to obtain moral justice; And it is easy to form institutional corruption.
Sister Fang? On the other hand, the institutional soil in Gong Aiai is that there is no property tax. To say the least, even if Gong Aiai's income is completely legal, it is completely legal for him to buy real estate in Beijing. However, the lack of property tax objectively widens the polarization between the rich and the poor. In the rapidly developing Beijing real estate market, Gong Aiai's real estate investment has undoubtedly gained huge profits. The lack of property tax makes the cost of holding real estate almost zero, which undoubtedly encourages a large number of rich people to invest in real estate and objectively raises the house price in a region. In this case, even if administrative control is taken, I am afraid it is difficult to stop the influx of real estate investment. If, like many countries, there are more houses, the tax rate will be higher. Even a luxury house with a villa income of 7% and 654.38+billion yuan has to pay 7 million yuan a year and more than 600,000 yuan a month. Under this tax system, if you hoard a lot of houses like Fang Jie, it is estimated that paying taxes will bankrupt her, and she certainly doesn't want to buy so many houses.
Sister Fang? There are other institutional soil, such as opaque property system. Want to be eliminated? Sister Fang? The key to this phenomenon is not how to deal with her, but how to eliminate the institutional root of this phenomenon as soon as possible. It is in this sense that the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed to improve the mechanism of sharing the proceeds from the transfer of public resources as soon as possible. Sister Fang? The key to the phenomenon. Its basic goal is to distribute public resources fairly and reasonably, and its benefits cannot be enjoyed by a few people; Quite a few experts also suggested that the property tax should be promoted as soon as possible on the basis of the pilot project, so that a person with nearly 10,000 square meters of real estate can enjoy the benefits of urbanization, and at the same time pay corresponding taxes, reflecting fairness and justice.