Don't have too many opinions when commenting on current events. Even if you want to express it, you should use prefixes such as possible, maybe, probably and should. Otherwise, as long as the expression contains any inflammatory content, it is likely to have a bad influence on readers, and your own words can easily be identified as illegal content. Be careful what you say and do, not only for readers, but also for yourself.
In particular, any comment or speculation on such a serious accident as an air crash may touch the sensitive nerves of public opinion. If there is "it must be like that, it must be necessary, it must be ……", it may be considered as a rumor in the published speculation. Since it is speculative, we should always express an uncertain tone so as not to mislead readers.
Let's take a look at the biased reports issued by the western media when they pick things up. Almost all of them are vague, and the author's irrelevant personal speculation is also true. If we put it here, we will directly characterize it as a rumor.
But as far as this matter is concerned, because the Civil Aviation Administration has not yet announced the reasons, it is insinuated that the Civil Aviation Administration has covered up the facts on various conspiracy theories. This kind of reasoning logic is purely ignorant and fearless.
Anyone with common sense in this field knows that unless it is such an obvious thing as 9 1 1, it will take months or even years to investigate the air crash. Because resorting to conspiracy theories without reporting for more than 20 days can only prove that you have never seen an air crash, that's all.
What's more, Americans also extracted black box data, and NTSB also participated in the on-site investigation. How do you want to forge it and cover it up? Are Americans dumb?
The key is not whether there is a conspiracy theory, but the argument logic of "using reasons that have not been announced for more than 20 days as arguments to prove the existence of conspiracy theories" is simply untenable. I don't know if the argument is wrong, but the argument process is purely brainless.
The fact is that the cause of the air crash was announced in less than a month, but this is a rare thing.