How to restore the credibility of the government?

In fact, everyone in the industry knows that PX is not as terrible as described in the rumor. In the United States, Britain, Japan and other places, there are mature experiences and precedents, and factories and residential areas can live in peace not far apart. However, despite all kinds of questions raised by the local government and experts, the public just don't believe it. Some media have done a survey: Why do you oppose the PX project? Most netizens chose "the government is definitely not kind enough to do this project". The seemingly absurd reasons reflect the lack of credibility of local governments, and local governments are caught in a crisis of trust. In fact, not only PX project, Shifang Mo-Cu project and Nantong Paihai project all encountered the same problem. Some places are very confused, saying that our hearing has also been held and publicity has been issued. I haven't left a single program behind. Why does the public still distrust it? These places have made a logical mistake, not to say that such a set of procedures is carried out for the project to land, but to carry out such a set of procedures to decide whether the project will land or not. Under the guidance of wrong logic, many places took detours. For example, in some places, public information is specially selected on weekends and holidays, which is intended to attract people's attention and be transmitted quickly. Moreover, some public information is extremely brief, and the phrase "the project has passed the most stringent audit and meets the national standards and requirements" is considered as public information. This kind of information that only judges without details is undoubtedly unconvincing. Not only will the public not accept it, but they will feel that there is something hidden behind it. In other places, hearings are held as "briefings" or "briefings". In fact, the decision was made before the hearing, which was just a procedure. What's more, they either fiddle with the hearing representatives or set obstacles in the hearing procedure. Hearings like this have lost their meaning and cannot represent real public opinion. Contradictions are temporarily covered up, seemingly harmonious, but they have planted a "time bomb" for the future, which seems to advance rather than retreat. Public opinion can't be suppressed, covered, and normal channels can't get through. People always look for opportunities to vent. As a result, some local people "walked out" to boycott, which led to the final shutdown or abortion of the project, and the government "lost its wife and lost its soldiers". Behind the fierce expression of the public are actually unheard of public opinions, rights that are not respected, and unsatisfied demands. Sima Guang made a classic evaluation of the government's incorruptibility in "Learning from each other": a man who believes in his husband is the wealth of the monarch. The state protects the people and the people protect the letter; It is impossible to convince the people, and it is impossible for them to defend the country. Local governments should be alert, learn from it, and strive to restore and enhance the credibility of the government. Trust comes from information disclosure and effective communication, and trust comes from words and deeds. Local governments should learn from the incidents again and again, instead of repeating the same mistakes again and again, falling into the embarrassing cycle of "slapping their heads" and "stopping when they quarrel".