Nowadays, many people still like to work in state-owned enterprises and think it is an iron rice bowl. I don't know how bad this job is! 1. If you can't do your job well without any relationship, it's normal for college students to work as workers in state-owned enterprises and have no diplomas. 2. In state-owned enterprises, you have to be able to please the leaders and let them' appreciate' you, so that you can climb even if you don't have the ability to work. 3. If you have the ability to prevent people with ulterior motives from ganging up and running on you, usually those who have the ability are a little lofty, disdainful of means and rely on their ability to eat, but the result of thinking like this is that you will be fooled. I always think that the national policy is good, but it has changed when it is implemented! For example, if you reduce the number of people and improve efficiency, I won't help you improve efficiency. I will play around and pay my salary and bonus as usual. Finally, you have to add me. Another example is the secondary distribution of bonuses. There are too many tricks in it. I won't go into details one by one. The enthusiasm for work has not improved, but all other enthusiasm has come out. The reform of state-owned enterprises has provided some people with opportunities to abuse power for personal gain. I saw a post on the Internet and felt the same way:
State-owned enterprises have low wages, while private enterprises have high wages.
In the past, state-owned enterprises gave gifts on holidays, but now private enterprises give gifts on holidays.
State-owned enterprises always like to cultivate mediocre talents, while private enterprises always like to retain talents.
The interpersonal relationship of state-owned enterprises is very important, and private enterprises are doing performance.
State-owned enterprises go through the back door, while private enterprises leave the door.
There are many rules and regulations of state-owned enterprises, but few are implemented; Less private enterprise system, more implementation.
State-owned enterprises engage in competition, while private enterprises talk about competition.
The state looks forward to holidays, while private enterprises take fewer holidays all year round.
State-owned enterprises make mistakes, officials are in charge, private enterprises make mistakes and are laid off.
State-owned enterprises go home when they arrive, and private enterprises have to do things sooner or later.
What are the adverse consequences if state-owned enterprises are transformed into private enterprises? If such a thing really happens, this country and this country
It was a good thing to change state-owned enterprises into private enterprises. Private enterprises are more motivated to work and the reward and punishment system is better. The main problem lies in the evaluation of state-owned assets. Hundreds of millions of assets were seriously underestimated and sold to current leaders at low prices. * * * Corrupt officials colluded to cover up the truth. There is no good solution to this kind of thing, and asset evaluation is too difficult. It is the general trend that employees of state-owned enterprises have the consciousness of self-reliance.
We are a state-owned enterprise, and the relationship between employees and superiors is super complicated, so don't talk when you start coming in, observe more, and gradually you will see a lot of tricks.
This is the national condition of China.
The secretary of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection said that state-owned enterprises cannot become private property.
The CPC Central Commission for Discipline Inspection criticized the loss of state-owned assets of state-owned enterprises!
First, the rights issue policy leads to the state-owned assets legally becoming private property.
The first step of the property right reform of state-owned enterprises is to promote it in the form of joint-stock system, and generally distribute shares in the proportion of buy one get one free. In reality, there are also things that exploit policy loopholes. In the form of equity restructuring, the evaluation price of state-owned assets is confirmed at a low price, and the policy of buy one get one free leads to a large loss of state-owned assets. The original intention of the national policy is good. It encourages employees to participate in the enterprise and become the owners of the enterprise. It is also an effective way to promote the diversification of enterprise economy and accelerate the construction of modern enterprises. In practice, most state-owned enterprises have bought out employees' identities, without considering shares or arranging jobs, leaving them in a state of unemployment, which makes the proceeds of policy rights issue fall into the hands of a few people and some people who have the right to operate the market. These seemingly legal and reasonable process changes, the essence of which is to enrich themselves with the loss of state-owned assets, hide the causal relationship between black-box operation and transaction interaction.
Second, the sale of state-owned assets with the legality of auction has caused disguised losses.
First of all, the auction procedure is not scientific enough and the pricing is not reasonable enough. Minimize the evaluation value of assets sold; Secondly, people with real power participate in the transaction to drive down the selling price. In the process of auction, some powerful people join hands with powerful people, through various means and methods, open auction, secret transaction, and use all available relationships to achieve the purpose of buying at a low price. The essence is the interaction of power, money and Qian Qian, and the calculation is still state-owned assets.
Third, selling at the agreed price has contributed to the loss of state-owned assets.
Judging from the sale of some state-owned assets, some of them are finally sold at the agreed price by auction, and there are also many flexible means and unknown tricks. There is a state-owned enterprise, the starting price is very low, but due to the large scale of assets, after the auction information was released, there were quite few bidders who signed up, and finally two enterprises with economic strength bid. Before the auction began, a bidder had an accident and was delayed for nearly half an hour on the way, but I called the host of the auction to ask for an extension, but in the end it didn't work. Their delay just left a good operating space for the auction to be converted into an agreement price, and achieved the goal of low-cost transaction. During the auction, some competitors were dissuaded by the authorities, that is, they made a wish to the bidders to withdraw automatically in advance and registered with some big names, thus crowding out some retail investors with weak financial strength and eliminating competitors, and finally benefiting their accomplices. In this case, few people directly accept cash bribes in terms of power, and most of them use dry shares and arrange personnel as trading means to make profits for them for a long time. However, the state-owned assets lost the difference of recoverable funds because of the agreed price.
Four, the property rights system reform caused by poor management and asset loss.
In the process of property rights reform, some enterprises failed to register, record and evaluate assets in time due to the intervention of powerful people or the detention of relevant evaluation agencies. As a result, some registered assets cannot be confirmed old and new, and unrecorded assets become off-balance-sheet assets. In the end, the former managers sold or transported the state-owned assets for their own use by stealing columns and stealing from inside, resulting in the loss of state-owned assets in the reform process. Because of the special situation, once there is a problem, it will be turned into a trivial matter because of human relations.
5. There is no reasonable compensation for depreciation losses caused by intangible losses.
This situation mainly occurs in the whole leasing process of state-owned enterprises, which is generally rented by enterprises as a whole, and its rent is recovered by relevant departments. If these rents are not used for the maintenance of state-owned assets, but used for other purposes or squandered, it will lead to the inevitable result that the worn and reduced value will not be compensated, thus forming the loss of state-owned assets after depreciation.
Six, the loss of state-owned assets formed by the donation relationship.
In the process of reform, some people in power gave their temporarily unused furniture and appliances to some relevant departments or close individuals for free, or lent them to finance, which eventually led to losses or bad debts on the grounds that they could not get them back, or directly gave them away. These seemingly trivial things, such as many a mickle makes a mickle, will also be a great loss of state-owned assets.
Seven, the state-owned shares of enterprises in the distribution of benefits caused by the loss of state-owned assets.
In enterprises with state-owned shares, most enterprises will calculate state-owned assets through some unreasonable distribution and illegal means, and gradually expand their individual shares in state-owned shares, and finally realize ...
Will employees of state-owned enterprises be investigated if they are all service outsourcing employees?
State-owned enterprises have preparation and outsourcing. If you think something is fishy, you can report it directly.
Heroes, lawyers and elites, please help me! Well, I used to work in a state-owned enterprise, which went bankrupt in 2008 (fake bankruptcy, in fact, another 5 points were established).
The prosecution period for the enterprise failing to pay the employee pension insurance is only two years, and your appeal has passed the time limit.
Why are the apps developed by state-owned enterprises always so rubbish? For example, 12306 China Mobile and so on ... I mean, compared with other companies' apps.
Spoiled, because most state-owned enterprises have the advantage of monopolizing the market! You don't have to use it as you want, there are not many choices anyway.
Oh, what about the treatment of state-owned enterprises?
First, the entrepreneurial treatment of state-owned enterprises is very hasty, and the things they do are also very hard. As long as it's not "someone up there", it's not necessarily free.
Second: state-owned enterprises jump into foreign enterprises. This work should be completed within two years as far as possible. Indeed, cultural differences are quite big. After a long time, foreign companies will not need it. Now foreign companies are welcome this year, and they like to cultivate themselves.
Third: state-owned enterprises have good soft treatment and few tricks (few, not none! ) welfare and the like, according to national standards, you won't be short of it. If you have an accident (mainly the health of your family), China enterprises are very humane and will take care of you more or less.
May it help lz.
Why should enterprises inflate their income and profits?
When you are faced with the need to examine the performance of your boss to determine the size of "political achievements"; Or what will you do if there is no possibility of financing under the premise of unprofitable! !
I was seconded from a state-owned enterprise, and I sued it for unpaid wages. This company asked me to write an apology on the grounds that I worked as a miner for two days for no reason.
At this point, it is estimated that both sides will no longer accept you, so both sides will sue together. There must be something fishy directly between this company and the leaders of the state-owned enterprises where you once worked, and you won't have a good life when you go back. Now you can take out the contract signed with them and consult a lawyer. Sue them all.