Why is there a "northward drift" but no "upward drift" or "wide drift"

Yes

First-tier cities have concentrated all the best resources and welfare in China. In China, children's education is a hurdle for every family.

According to statistics, among people living in Guangzhou, there is one "guangxin person" for every three people. Among the total birth population in Guangzhou in 20 17, the "floating second generation" accounted for 27%. In other words, 3 out of every 10 babies born are "non-Guangzhou household registration". In that year, only 600 1 person successfully entered Guangzhou through points, and the lowest score in the ranking of social security points was 130, that is, 1 1 year for continuous social security payment.

For the children of these migrant workers, non-Guangzhou household registration/non-Guangzhou household registration is a big label, which is often related to various resources and interests, and the most direct impact is enrollment.

After working hard in Guangzhou, Guangpiao, an extended material, failed to take root here. This group of second-generation vagrants are also destined to have a wandering childhood, and the future is a passive choice. Although it is not popular to leave children at home and become left-behind children, in the end, the pace of their own efforts can't keep up with the crazy rise in housing prices and the strict household registration policy, which also makes the dream of this group of "Guangpiao people" to settle down in the foreseeable future.

With the popularization of education, reading has become a luxury in Guangzhou. The so-called elite education is often only open to registered students. Born in these big cities, they enjoy this unique condition in educational resources, which many foreign children or rural children can't enjoy, so it is decided that children in big cities are destined to walk at the starting line of education.