"As far as I know, the main problem is that the plan has not landed. The examination and approval of rural residential land, one is planning ahead, and the other is building qualification examination. Building qualification examination is the precondition of planning. If the planning preconditions are not met, there is no basis for approval. "
As for the reasons for not being approved, the reporter repeatedly contacted Li Gang, then the deputy mayor in charge of urban construction in Pingqiao Town and now a member of Xuan Tong in Longxi Township. So far, he hasn't received a reply from Li Gang.
Extended data:
What happened:
After the demolition of 20 14, Lao Yu's family lived in a row of bungalows near the intersection of Dongtangxia Village, 323 Provincial Highway. This row of bungalows is a resettlement house specially prepared for houseless households in Pingqiao Town. At that time, the relevant leaders verbally promised to arrange the homestead for Lao Yujia as soon as possible. 20 16, this row of bungalows was demolished due to incomplete procedures.
Subsequently, Lao Yu and his wife were placed in the tile house that was originally used to raise cattle in the village; His son Yu Long, a family of four, was placed in the office of Pingqiao Town Agricultural Machinery Station. These two houses are simple stone houses in the countryside, and there is little decoration in them.
Yu Long said that the family had applied in writing to the village for building a homestead four times in April 20 16, 20 17, 20 18, and 2018, but none of them were approved. "I submitted my application for the first time and the village did not respond. The second time, I gave a disapproving answer. The third and fourth directly refused. "
During the application period, Lao Yujia also took up legal weapons and sued the village committee of Dongtangxia Village in the court on 20 17 for refusing to approve his application for homestead. Tiantai County People's Court pronounced that Dongtangxia Village's rejection of Laoyu's application for homestead was illegal, ordered to be revoked and given a new reply within 60 days.
Since then, Taizhou Intermediate People's Court has also rejected the appeal of Dongtangxia Village Committee and upheld the original judgment. However, what Lao Yu didn't expect was that the reply from the village Committee of Dongtangxia Village was still a one-vote veto. In desperation, the Lao Yu family took the village committee of Dongtangxia village to court again on 20 18, and won the case, but it still didn't help.