The murderer of Hangzhou's wife-killing and dismemberment case upheld the death penalty in the second instance. What information is worth paying attention to in this case?

The murderer of Hangzhou's wife-killing and dismemberment case upheld the death penalty in the second instance. What information is worth paying attention to in this case? I don't know much about the legal procedure of the death penalty, but I feel that Xu Guoli was sentenced to death and deserved it. The public evidence is conclusive, and the logical reasoning between the evidences is reasonable and legal, which can withstand scrutiny. There is no problem in calling it an iron case. Objectively speaking, the murder of Xu Guoli's wife has a strong public anger. Not only are thousands of netizens angry, but those who never surf the internet are also angry when they hear about it. Thanks to the police in Hangzhou, especially the police who found evidence in the septic tank in the heat. With you, the country and society can get peace. Your work may not be brilliant, but it will last forever. The last sentence is summed up in vernacular Chinese: Xu Guoli deserves to die.

After the judgment of the first instance comes out, there is basically no suspense, because the cases sentenced to death for immediate execution are all major criminal cases, and they all have to go to the judicial Committee. Who is the judicial committee, not a professional expert or key personnel, but also an elite team of the judicial committees of the first-class courts and the intermediate people's courts? The defendant Xu Guoli's appeal is just stalling for time. After all, before the execution of the death penalty, their litigation rights should be guaranteed according to law, just like Voltaire's famous saying: I can disagree with your point of view, but I will defend your right to speak to the death.

In the second trial, Xu Guoli twice asked the collegial panel to be acquitted, arguing that the facts of his suicide were unclear and the evidence was insufficient. The collegial panel didn't stop him from speaking, because the collegial panel was defending your right to speak, but it didn't agree with you. If there is no accident, the death penalty approval procedure should have been started, reported to the Supreme Court for approval of the death penalty, and reported to the President of the Supreme Court for issuing a death penalty order. At the moment when Zhou Qiang, President of the Supreme Court, signed the death penalty order, this case with bad social influence finally ended at the cost of the defendant Xu Guoli's life.