I. Application for Intention
Applicants can express their approval intention to CNAL Secretariat by telephone, fax or any other electronic communication means. The CNAL Secretariat shall provide the latest version of the approval rules and other relevant documents to the applicant.
Second, the formal application
2. 1 The applicant shall provide the application materials and pay the application fee as required by CNAL Secretariat.
2.2 CNAL Secretariat shall review the application materials formally submitted by the applicant. If the information submitted by the applicant is complete, clear and correct, and has a basic understanding of the relevant requirements of CNAL, and the quality management system has been officially operated for more than 6 months and has undergone complete internal audit and management review, the applicant's quality management system and technical activities can be formally accepted, and on-site review will be arranged within 3 months. Except for the delay caused by the applicant. Otherwise, the applicant should know the situation in detail and obtain the consent of the applicant if necessary. The expenses shall be borne by the applicant to determine whether the applicant is qualified for re-examination within 3 months. If the applicant cannot be examined within 3 months, the formal acceptance of the application shall be suspended.
2.3 In the process of data review, consultation or initial visit, CNAL Secretariat shall inform the applicant of the non-conformity found, so that he can take corresponding measures.
2.4 When the applicant applies for testing, calibration or other competence recognition and is formally accepted, the applicant will be required to participate in the appropriate competence verification plan as much as possible.
Third, review preparation
3. 1 CNAL Secretariat appoints the evaluation team and obtains the consent of the applicant. If the applicant rejects any member of the evaluation team on the grounds of fairness, the secretariat will make adjustments after verification.
3.2 The review team will review the quality management system documents and related materials submitted by the applicant. When it is found that the document does not meet the requirements, the review team leader shall notify the applicant in writing to take corrective measures. According to the proposal of the head of the evaluation team, the secretariat can negotiate with the applicant for pre-evaluation when necessary. Pre-trial only verifies or further understands the problems found in the data review, without consulting, but a written pre-trial report must be submitted to the secretariat. After the applicant takes effective corrective measures to solve the main problems found, the review team leader can conduct on-site review.
3.3 After the documents are approved, the audit team leader and the applicant agree on the specific time schedule and audit plan for on-site audit. Implemented after approval by CNAL Secretariat.
3.4 CNAL may designate observers to participate in the review team when necessary.
Fourth, on-site review
4. 1 The evaluation team conducts on-site evaluation on the technical ability and quality management within the application scope of the applicant according to CNAL's evaluation criteria, rules and policies and relevant technical standards.
4.2 In the on-site review of the applicant's testing and calibration capabilities, it is necessary to use the situation and results of participating in the capability verification activities to arrange measurement review. CNAL will take the applicant's performance in competency verification as an important basis for approval. In addition, the review team will also evaluate the applicant's authorized signatory. CNAL requires authorized signatories to meet the following conditions:
A) Have the necessary professional knowledge and corresponding work experience, be familiar with the relevant inspection standards, inspection methods and inspection procedures for inspection and calibration within the scope of authorized signature, and be able to make a correct evaluation of the inspection results of inspection and calibration.
B) Be familiar with accreditation rules and policy accreditation conditions, especially the obligations of accreditation bodies and the regulations on the use of inspection and calibration reports or certificates with accreditation marks;
C) Be responsible for the correctness of the test and calibration results, and have corresponding management authority.
The materials to be prepared for ISO900 1 quality management system certification are as follows:
1, copy of enterprise business license and copy of organization code certificate;
2, enterprise measurement and test equipment verification report;
3. Special post certificate;
4. 1, 2 and 3 documents, including quality manual and procedure documents;
5, enterprise supply and marketing information;
6, enterprise human resources information;
7. General situation of the enterprise and the number of existing employees;
8, management review, internal audit, satisfaction and other information.
The specific process is as follows
Step 1: The applicant submits a formal application signed by his authorized representative. The application or its annexes shall include: such as the nature, name, address, legal status and relevant human and technical resources of the institution;
The scope of products or services covered by the application for ISO900 1 certification; A copy of the business license of the legal person, and provide a copy of the qualification certificate and production license when necessary; General information about the quality system and activities. The applicant agrees to comply with the certification requirements and provide the information needed for the evaluation.
Step 2: Make a decision on acceptance, rejection or acceptance after improvement within 30 days after the contract review from the date of receiving the applicant's application materials, and notify the entrusting party (auditee).
Ensure that:
The requirements for certification are clearly defined, recorded and understood;
B. The differences of understanding between the certification body and the applicant are resolved;
C the certification body has the ability to certify the scope of certification, business premises and some special requirements, such as the language used by the applicant.
Step 3: Both parties sign the Quality System Certification Contract. Before the on-site audit, the documented quality system established by the applicant's ISO900 1 standard should run for 3 months, and the consultant certification center should submit the quality manual and required related documents at least 2 months in advance.