The reason is that the work notice is mixed with the consultation, feedback and chat of colleagues, and the notice information is easy to be brushed up.
After the supervisor agreed, I set up a new group, and the rules of the group are as follows: the group is forbidden at work to inform things, and it is forbidden at ordinary times. After receiving the notice, reply 1 to indicate receipt; Question feedback group is used for general communication. Call 1 actively.
Jianqun has been operating normally for half a month, except that one or two colleagues are forbidden to say a few words after occasional notice. Everything else seemed to be in harmony, and the problem broke out yesterday afternoon.
A colleague in the group sent a notice in the forbidden group. When a colleague in a district or county had a question, he immediately asked in the forbidden group, and the colleague who sent the notice also answered in the forbidden group. Then another colleague in the group made a joke in the group. In an instant, the forbidden group seems to have thawed, and information suddenly poured in, feedback, consultation, joking ... er, as a person who established the forbidden group, my heart.
In my own mind, I think it is necessary to ban the group, so I sent a paragraph:
Well, it's sad. Nobody talks to me.
At the end of work, I sent another paragraph:
Sure enough, nobody cares about me.
During the period, colleagues in the districts and counties were busy consulting in the group about buying equipment. The feedback is that no one pays attention to me. As a "city company leader", I am very hurt (with a smile on my face).
After work, there are two colleagues in the group. I ran to ask them (one of whom was a colleague who sent the notice this afternoon) whether it was better to use one group or two groups. The colleague who sent the notice said that two were too much trouble, so use one. Another colleague said that a group of news is easy to be pushed up. Send a notice to colleagues: it's @ every time. Me: What if everyone in our group has something to inform? It really happened. The scene was in chaos. Laugh. After silence, I informed my colleagues that the two groups were still in trouble.
So, in the end, the two groups became one group, and the name of the group was changed to: work exchange group.
Reflect on two questions: why the two modes of forbidden group and exchange group failed to continue, and why no one paid attention to me when I asked questions in the group.
I think the two-group model can improve work efficiency and information accuracy if it works well, but why not accept it?
Let's reflect on the ins and outs of the matter first.
First of all, at the beginning of building the group, I didn't communicate with my colleagues in the group in detail. I just discussed it with the supervisor and established it. This leads to: first, colleagues in the group are not clear about the significance and role of this group, or maybe some colleagues in the group do not agree with this model. Since they don't agree, it is impossible to help me speak in the group and maintain the group rules. Second, at the beginning of building the group, after I sent the first notice, colleagues in all districts and counties also sent 1 feedback according to the rules. At this time, the supervisor said, well done. I should have asked him to withdraw the news and explain the ban at this time, but I didn't. Plus, I didn't forbid everyone in the group to take a few words that were inconsistent with the notice and reply, so the rules have long since lost their meaning. To sum up, it eventually led to the prohibition of words.
First of all, people speak very softly (serious smile). Although I am a "city company leader", I am just a "tender doll" who has only been in the company for one year. If I were in charge, I guess everyone would reply.
Secondly, I'm going to hit my face, because a boy who joined the company with me is very popular. When I asked questions, everyone scrambled to ask him questions. Reason: everyone does have a lot of questions to ask him, and then, it seems that everyone is not particularly concerned about me (hum, this baby is unhappy). However, if you think about it seriously, it is understandable to be unhappy. After all, my job didn't directly stimulate everyone's pain points, and I felt that my job was very replaceable from the beginning (which is why I suddenly felt pressure and urgency just after working for a year). So the key to solving the problem is to do something extraordinary (smiling face) in an ordinary post, telling people that I want to make my irreplaceable work irreplaceable.
Finally, there is no specific XXX. So everyone thinks it's none of my business. For things that have no clear interests, everyone is generally reluctant to be the first person to eat crabs.
So the solution to the above problems is:
Finally, perhaps, for a small work group like us, it may be better not to group? After all, many times, the screen is not serious. Looking lively is also conducive to communication and timely feedback, and enhance feelings.
Finally, I wish you all a happy moon cake festival ~ babies who love to eat egg yolk lotus paste stuffing are all angels ~ ~ ~