As a political campaign film, Baclau has a clear political stance, but in this film with a lot of hodgepodge impression, Baclau inherited a lot of low-cost aesthetic interests, but also mistakenly brought this low-cost roughness into the text construction, so I think this film is not as good as I thought.
As an anti-colonial film, Baclau is still based on the wishes of the author of Mendoza. For example, the concept of "community" is equivalent to the modern "ethnic group" gradually evolving into the future, and there are a series of intruders in the film. They are Americans, but they kill people as soon as they enter the village, whether it is a family living in the village or a child with a flashlight.
It can be seen that these intruders actually don't know the purpose and significance of doing these things, but bow their heads and beg for mercy when they are hurt, and they have a strong desire to survive. I never thought about how people in this village feel when they hurt them. They just criticize others everywhere under the guise of human rights, which makes me very disgusted.