The first standard: the training teacher must have more than seven years of speech experience and more than five years of speech training experience.
If you don't have enough time to accumulate on the podium, you won't have enough profound understanding and sentiment about the speech, but often copy other people's courses without your own unique insights. It can also be called very professional to sharpen a sword for ten years and form a mature speech system of your own. In addition, people who can talk may not teach others to talk, so it is important to accumulate some experience in teaching others to talk. More than five years of training experience can be accumulated quite solidly.
The second criterion: at least half of the training course is training.
Because speaking is more about skills, actual combat training becomes very important. If the actual training time of a speech training class is less than half of the whole training class, the training will hardly have much effect.
The third criterion: there must be real cases of successful and effective training of previous students.
Since it is training, the effect is of course the first. Without it, everything will be empty. The same is true of pronunciation training. The training effect of previous students has become a key indicator to measure whether the training is reliable or not. So is speech training.
The fourth standard: during the training process, students' speeches must be recorded and tracked.
Watching your own speech video is a very good way to improve yourself. If the training institution can record and track the students' speeches during the training process and send them to the students, it will play a very auxiliary role in improving the students' speaking ability.
The fifth criterion: there must be a promise of unconditional refund for dissatisfaction.
Those who dare not promise an unconditional refund are essentially lacking sufficient confidence in their training courses. Although there is an essential difference between training and buying ordinary goods, because training depends on the efforts of both sides in the final analysis, the so-called teacher leads the door and practices in the individual, which is the truth. However, institutions that dare to promise unconditional refunds can at least show that the quality of their training courses need not be too worried.
The sixth standard: there must be a system that can make up missed classes and be retrained repeatedly.
Everyone will have special circumstances, such as overtime, business trip, and illness of children at home, so it is necessary to have a system of missing classes to make up lessons. In addition, everyone's foundation, learning ability and acceptance ability are different, so a retraining system is needed.
Seventh standard: training courses must be systematic.
The more systematic the study of any knowledge and skills, the better, which is very beneficial to students' theoretical understanding and practical operation. It is difficult for an unsystematic course to help students understand and improve a certain knowledge or skill professionally. That's the speech.
Eighth standard: the number of students in each training class shall not exceed 20.
Speech training needs key training, so it is very important for each student to give a speech on stage. If there are too many students, it means reducing the number of times and time for the first person to go on stage. This will inevitably affect the training effect. Training with less than 20 people can further ensure that each student has enough actual combat.