1. According to the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), it is stipulated as follows:
Article 313 Whoever refuses to execute the judgment or ruling of a people's court, if the circumstances are serious, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or a fine.
2. According to the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the provisions are as follows:
Article 1 1 1? If a litigant participant or other person commits one of the following acts, the people's court may impose a fine or detention according to the seriousness of the case; If the case constitutes a crime, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law:
(1) Forging or destroying important evidence, which hinders the people's court from hearing a case;
(2) using violence, threats or bribes to prevent witnesses from testifying or instigating, bribing or coercing others to commit perjury;
(3) Hiding, transferring, selling off or destroying the property that has been sealed up or detained, or transferring the property that has been counted and ordered to be kept;
(4) Insulting, slandering, framing, beating or retaliating against judicial personnel, participants in litigation, witnesses, translators, expert witnesses, inspectors and assisting executors;
(5) Obstructing judicial personnel from performing their duties by violence, threat or other means;
(6) Refusing to perform a legally effective judgment or ruling of the people's court.
The people's court may impose a fine or detention on a unit that commits one of the acts listed in the preceding paragraph; If a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law.
Extended data
It is understood that the applicant Guo lives in Wangmudu Town, Ganxian County, and his brother-in-law, Gu, once worked in a coal mine operated by the executor Zou, engaged in coal mining. In March, 20 12, Zou borrowed 60,000 yuan from Gu's wife for operating coal mine expenses due to business depression. After settlement, Zou owed Guo and Gu wages of 5,000 yuan and 2 1735 yuan respectively, and issued IOUs. Under the repeated urging of Guo and others, Zou only paid part of his salary and loan, so Guo and others took Zou to court respectively.
After the court's judgment, Zou failed to fulfill his obligation to pay, and Guo and others applied to the court for enforcement on February 20, 2002. Considering that the case involved the wages of migrant workers, the hospital quickly launched a green channel to safeguard the rights and interests of migrant workers. On the one hand, I tried to find Zou's whereabouts, on the other hand, I made a carpet inquiry about Zou's bank deposits, houses, vehicles and other properties, but there was no substantial progress.
At the end of September, 20 15, through many efforts, the executive judge got the clue that Zou was a local driving school coach, so he immediately investigated more than a dozen driving schools in the county one by one, and finally found Zou himself in June of 10 and 13, but Zou refused to implement it, with a very bad attitude.
In order to let Guo and others get their salary as soon as possible, the executive judge patiently and meticulously reasoned with Zou, but Zou always tried to shirk it on the grounds of living difficulties, so the judge decided to give Zou judicial custody 15 days. Under the strong executive pressure, Zou had to take the initiative to ask his family to raise 45,750 yuan to pay the debts owed by Guo and others. The case that dragged on for nearly three years was finally settled.
The Supreme People's Procuratorate-People's Republic of China (PRC) criminal law
China People's Congress Network-People's Republic of China (PRC) Civil Procedure Law
People's Network-"Lao Lai" has been in arrears for nearly 53,000 years? Decisive repayment after detention