1. The main objectives of new rural construction in Shandong Province are: demolishing all farmers' houses, merging villages, allowing all farmers to live in high-rise buildings, establishing new rural communities (commonly known as villages with 10,000 people) and implementing urbanization management. Since 2009-20 10 was fully promoted in various cities, the scale of rural housing renovation was unprecedented.
Secondly, the operation mode of new rural construction in Shandong Province: the township government's plan of "withdrawing villages and merging points and planning Gai Lou" is organized and implemented by itself after being approved by the higher authorities. After obtaining approval, the township government will demolish farmers' houses within the specified time after measuring villagers' houses and evaluating the value of villagers' real estate. Gai Lou's real estate development right, namely the new countryside, is organized and implemented by the local government.
Three, the demolition of farmers' real estate valuation is generally 300-400 yuan per square meter, and the buildings developed by local governments are generally 600-700 yuan per square meter or even higher. Farmers want to live in buildings with the same area, and they need 300-400 yuan or even more per square meter.
Four. Incentive measures of provincial and municipal governments to county and township governments: 1. For every 1 mu of land vacated by rural farmers' houses, the subsidy is 200,000 yuan. 2. The vacated land can be transferred for investment promotion and leased for income. 3. After farmers are centrally planned to large communities, they can intensively manage the cultivated land contracted by farmers according to local conditions, that is, subcontract the land to large-scale breeding households for large-scale operation, and landless farmers can become "agricultural workers" among large-scale land contracting households.
Five, the real situation of farmers:
1, in a passive or even rebellious state.
Most of them say that they can't afford to buy, move or decorate buildings, so they have to borrow money and can't bear such economic pressure.
3. Most people think that it is not in line with the reality of rural production and life, and that the forced demolition of a large number of farmers' houses is a rare black sheep in history, which is a serious violation and deprivation of rural farmers' property and economy and is intolerable.
4. Shandong version of the new rural construction is an act of disturbing people and wasting money, and it is a blackmail to farmers.
The buildings developed by the government belong to inferior buildings, and their safety and service life are far less than those built by farmers themselves. In the event of an earthquake, the "mass village" will become a "mass pit".
6. A considerable number of grass-roots governments resort to deceit and bullying in public opinion propaganda for political achievements and economic interests; In operation, it is to force farmers to submit.
7. Farmers are in a state of panic and extreme anxiety, which has caused great anxiety and fear. Extremely angry and helpless I feel confused and at a loss about my future life.
On the essence of new rural construction in Shandong province;
1, divorced from the basic direction of the CPC Central Committee on building a new socialist countryside, failed to realize that the core of building a new countryside lies in developing rural productive forces, improving farmers' scientific and cultural quality, and effectively increasing farmers' income. It is wrong to think that the new countryside means that farmers live in buildings and urbanize.
2. It deviates from the Scientific Outlook on Development advocated by the CPC Central Committee and violates the basic laws of rural social development. At present, the development level of rural productive forces in Shandong Province is extremely unbalanced, the overall level of rural productive forces is not high, the rural economy is very weak, and the material culture and spiritual culture are still at a low level. In this case, it violates the basic laws of rural social and economic development and deviates from Scientific Outlook on Development.
3. The principle of being divorced from seeking truth from facts, relying on the people's heart and public opinion is harmful to the rural economic development in Shandong. Shandong farmers' life has not yet reached a well-off level, farmers' life is still very poor, and their economic endurance is very limited, so they can't stand the toss. In this new rural movement, farmers will not only return to abject poverty, but also bring heavy economic burden to most farmers and greatly reduce their economic ability. It is an act of hollowing out farmers' pockets at one time, which eventually leads to the long-term stagnation of Shandong rural economy and the complete loss of sustainable development.
4. Farmers have lost the material basis for their survival and buried the root of social unrest. If the rural land is intensively managed after the merger of villages, it will mean that a large number of farmers will lose the land on which to live, which will not only further weaken the basic material conditions for farmers to survive and increase their income, but also because of mechanized operations, the empty dreams of a large number of "migrant workers" will be dashed, leading to most farmers becoming unemployed refugees, thus bringing terrible hidden dangers to social stability in China. Anyone with a little knowledge of history knows that rural stability in China is the pillar of social stability in China.
5. The reason why the new rural construction in Shandong at this stage is eagerly promoted by the grass-roots government, allowing farmers to live in buildings and improving the living environment, highlights the huge economic benefits, which is driven by economic interests. First, allocate 1 mu of land from the village merger, and subsidize 200,000 yuan, which has great economic benefits. Second, the vacated land can be transferred, attracting investment and renting, and huge benefits can be obtained. Third, the price difference per square meter paid by farmers when they live in buildings will be a huge economic income. Therefore, there are huge economic benefits hidden behind Gai Lou, allowing farmers to live in buildings. This is the essence of the problem. The key point is that the economic benefits pursued by the government are entirely taken from farmers, which is an act of competing for profits with the people.
From the above point of view, although the way of building a new countryside in Shandong Province may be because it is eager to build a new countryside, there may be a phenomenon of competing with the people and disturbing the people in specific operations, which is suspected of being too hasty. On the ruling idea, we need to further understand the true connotation of the new countryside of the CPC Central Committee. This move should be based on local conditions and full respect for public opinion. We must not rush into action, which will seriously affect the relationship between cadres and the masses and the overall situation of national stability. We should maintain and promote the sustainable development of rural economy from the perspective of developing productive forces, and it is not advisable to exhaust the resources and fish.