In the face of your own mistakes, should you pretend to be confused and continue not to adjust, or bravely correct yourself for not being afraid of winning the championship? Lippi showed why he was a great coach during the China-Iraq war.
I realized the imbalance between offense and defense in the first half. At half-time, I removed two players who were inclined to attack and turned to the defensive area. If there is a mistake, you must correct it, but in fact you have made the same mistake. Compared with Iranian physical confrontation, Huang Bowen and Lei Wu are actually the same players as Zhang Xizhe, which doesn't help either. Once again, I denied myself and changed my formation to 343 to achieve a relative balance between attack and defense.
Jiang Zhipeng can't defend against Iranian players, so let's talk about the winger and use his offensive characteristics to push back the opponent's attack. Feng Xiaoting, whose physical quality is better than his, reinforced the defensive gap left by him, and made the best choice at the tactical level by adjusting one attack and one defense.
After the war between China and South China, everyone was discussing what Lippi had brought to football. Here, let's break away from the game itself and say something else. Personally, Lippi taught China football three lessons in Nanning, Changsha and Teheran: true love, football truthfulness, courage and determination to pursue truth.
These are the scarce products of China football and society. China people respect face and love to pretend. What's wrong with a mistake? Even if Lippi made a mistake, he changed it when he knew it, and changed it again. This is part of football and does not damage Lippi's master image at all.
What is the most valuable thing? Is it the football concept, knowledge and technology taught by Lippi himself? No, these can be learned through books or the internet. The most valuable thing is the way he teaches, his passion, style and taste for truth.
Zhang Shousheng, a tenured professor at Stanford University, has a wonderful story about this and why he studied and worked with the master: "The truth of science is objective, but the process of seeking knowledge is often subjective. Masters are often known for their beauty. It is because Einstein firmly believed in the beauty of the universe that he found the eternal truth. The objective truth of science can often be learned from books, but the master's taste and style, aesthetics and choice can only be understood by studying and working around. I think the combination of truth, goodness and beauty is the highest concept of education. Some professional knowledge may be forgotten and replaced. But the passion, taste and style of knowledge can accompany you all your life and help you reach the peak of your career. "
Going back to the goal, the goal is the cumulative result of various comprehensive factors. Tactics, state and ability are eggs under the comprehensive action. So, don't complain about why Jiang Zhipeng didn't put the ball near the baseline, just like don't complain that it's illegal to hit the ball with both arms in volleyball.
Look at the figure of Iranian players, which is equivalent to the smaller Hulk, 1 1 Little Hulk. In the Super League and AFC Champions League, we have seen both positive and negative textbooks on how to defend Hulk. One-on-one combat is definitely not possible. At least one person should be added to help defend. Defending 1 1 The small Hulk means that people must pile up in the backcourt. Many people are not necessarily useful,
But not many people don't. I think China Cup and European teams have tried right and wrong. In the pre-match notice, the key word of the Sino-Iranian war is, how to make up for Iran's physical strength and confrontation strength?
Of course, is it better to use players with relatively good health after the game, such as Cai Huikang, Yu Hai and Ren Hang? Play 4 central defenders, 4 backcourt, 1 frontcourt, 1 striker? Ugly draw?
Look at our left side again. Obviously, Jiang Zhipeng and Zhang Xizhe are not characterized by confrontation and defense, and Gao Lin, as a winger, can't ask him to recover too much. The Iranians had a strong attack on the right, so they decided to fight here all the time.
Because I realized that if I keep kicking like this, I will lose the ball sooner or later. Therefore, the coach in the school flatly replaced two players in the center and frontcourt at the same time to maintain and increase the competition resources in the defensive area. This idea and direction are right, but as I said before, this is a new form of adjustment. Besides, if two people play at the same time, the whole system will have to adapt and warm up. ...
The source of all this is that the coach is too optimistic about the outcome before the game and his own attack power. Generally speaking, there are two ways to make up for the emptiness of defense. One way is to encircle Wei and save Zhao, invest resources in the frontcourt and push back the opponent's offensive. The Sino-Korean War is a classic example. In Changsha, instructors only use this kitchen knife. The other is to reinforce directly in the rear. The instructions in the room were changed to 343, that is, two kitchen knives were placed in tandem at the same time.
Besides, isn't it enough to study and make use of the weaknesses of the Iranian team? For example, Iranians are more emotional when playing football. After the two midfielders get yellow cards, there may be a tactical design, similar to Cannavaro's instigation of Woolzer to tease Qin Sheng and let his students muddle through in Hongkou.
However, with regard to the Sino-Iraqi war, compared vertically, 0- 1 has been an improvement. I have been a guest at Azadi Stadium five times before, and the minimum consumption is to lose two goals. I believe that most people's judgment on China and Iranian football is that there is a big gap in personal ability, which has little to do with coach and tactical application. When the gap between individual abilities reaches a certain level, no matter how good the coach and tactics are.
There is a gap between China and Korean players, but it is not very big. Still in Lippi's service area, plus a little luck, effective. But Hailan is sorry, I walked out of the service area under the guidance of Li.
The fundamental reason is that the Brazilian colonial football style of the Super League has led China football into the wrong direction. My China ass can't stand up like a hulk. Therefore, the Super League team is not a team, but a mixture of two teams. These two teams can't pee in each other's style of play and spirit.
In fact, Japan and South Korea have set an example of how to play football for the yellow race. We have paid a huge price for superficial achievements and the pursuit of so-called quick results. Will we pay a higher price?
John Yang, head coach of Changsha Temporary Football Club.