Advantages and disadvantages of mixed reform of state-owned enterprises to employees

Legal analysis: First of all, the reform of state-owned enterprises has broken the status quo that entering state-owned enterprises means having an iron rice bowl. The reform of state-owned enterprises is to ensure that managers can go up and down, and employees can enter and leave. In the way of employing people, the appointment system, selection system and appointment system are adopted. Only by breaking the iron rice bowl can we stimulate the enthusiasm of employees and give promising people a place. Secondly, the former state-owned enterprises did more than one thing. After the reform, for employees, the performance appraisal of all employees will widen the income gap reasonably. Pay differentiation, improve work efficiency and enhance enthusiasm. Moreover, after the reform of state-owned enterprises, it will also have an impact on the competition of companies. The previous company competition may be a formality, the information is not open, and the recruitment is opaque. After the reform of state-owned enterprises, managers will be recruited, and capable people will get more things. Finally, the reform of state-owned enterprises is indeed not as stable as before for old employees. However, as long as you don't have the mentality of muddling along, you can still get a good development.

Legal basis: People's Republic of China (PRC) Labor Law.

Article 24 A labor contract may be dissolved after the parties to the labor contract reach an agreement through consultation.

Article 26 Under any of the following circumstances, the employer may terminate the labor contract, but it shall notify the employee in writing 30 days in advance:

(1) The employee suffers from illness or non-work-related injury, and after the medical treatment expires, he can't engage in the original job or other jobs arranged by the employer;

(two) the laborer is not competent for the job, and he is still not competent for the job after training or adjusting his post;

(3) The objective conditions on which the labor contract was concluded have changed greatly, which makes the original labor contract impossible to perform and the parties cannot reach an agreement on changing the labor contract through consultation.