The shutdown of this incident also made us see some problems behind it. The emergence of Beijing Medical Communication is a social trend and situation. People need efficient, convenient and low-cost medical care, and medical institutions also need to save costs and improve service efficiency. Therefore, Beijing Medical Link is undoubtedly a good project that benefits the people and the people. But enterprises undertake such public welfare projects? Payer? It has become a big problem, and how to support the funds for a long time is the key problem to prevent this kind of project from falling off the chain.
Just like the Beijing Medical Communication incident, a person familiar with the matter has revealed that at the beginning of the Beijing Medical Communication Project, the funders were not only Bank of Beijing, but many banks wanted to share a piece of the government dividend. However, due to the complicated capital contribution, the business model gradually deviated from the original, and the long payment period of Bank of Beijing caused contradictions between the two sides, which subsequently fermented into such a social problem.
Some netizens also believe that in the final analysis, because of the excessive tilt of medical conditions, many small cities have insufficient medical conditions, and they have flocked to first-and second-tier cities for medical treatment, which has aggravated the original medical pressure in cities. If the country's medical resources are equal, then there will be no high-cost and inefficient medical care. In fact, it takes a long time and conditions to solve the problem of unequal medical data. For this problem, we can actually speed up the integration of medical insurance cards in the whole network or develop a national universal product and distribute it to various cities, thus providing convenience for patients everywhere.