The protagonist this time is ——eQ2, a coach model dedicated to Chery New Energy. This car is a pure electric version, but it adopts manual mode, so it is specially prepared for driving school. Personal purchase is almost negligible, and the main force is the bulk purchase of driving schools. The accident happened in Xiangyang city. Both sides of the accident were Xiangyang local license plates, and the bigger Chuanqi GS7 was the rear-end collision.
In fact, eQ2 of Chery New Energy was changed to a pure electric version on the basis of the early Yikai C3. According to the information provided in the catalogue, the C3EV declared earlier is quite different from eQ2 in the catalogue 306. The kerb mass of C3EV is 1.27 tons, which is 140 kg higher than that of the fuel version, while the latest eQ2 kerb mass is 1.325 tons, which is nearly 20% higher. Obviously, the battery pack has been increased, because their power models (that is, motor models) are exactly the same, both of which are 2 103 as models of Wuhu Jienuorui Automobile Electrical System Co., Ltd., and their power is also 4 1.8Kw, so only the battery system has been greatly modified, and the 25 1 km mentioned in the tax exemption is the comprehensive driving range. As for the rival Chuanqi GS7, the length, width and height are 4730/1911770 mm, the wheelbase is 2720mm (the wheelbase of Chery New Energy eQ2 is 2.5 1 m), and the curb weight of 1.8T is/kl.
Judging from the actual impact results, the entire eQ2 tail was completely reimbursed. Of course, the impact point is behind the driver's seat, so this part is also the most collapsed, but at the same time, it can be seen that the C-pillar can hold up. It should be known that Chuanqi GS7 is not only high (1.77m height versus 1.5 1 m height), but also the outer contour of the engine compartment is square. It can be said that the engine compartment is higher than the trunk of eQ2, so it is easy to push. It's lucky to keep the C-pillar. At least, the member cabin is intact and the structure has not been impacted. This credit is also due to the trunk. It is not that the structural strength of the whole vehicle is tough. Of course, the structural design is reasonable and there is no deviation, achieving the expected design purpose, at least not being turned into a single car by a half-ton car. Generally speaking, coaches are full, which will be quite serious if they become bicycles.
Let's take a look at the positive effects of Chuanqi GS7. Although I was psychologically prepared, I was shocked to see the photos. This kind of damage seems to be not optimistic. At least water stains (or oil stains) have been seen on the ground, and the water tank has been completely destroyed. There is nothing wrong with the hood. The hood itself has the design purpose of absorbing energy and collapsing, which is based on pedestrian protection. The complete anti-collision steel beam also shows that there is no big deformation in the whole vehicle structure. The advantages of weight and physique are vividly reflected, but in terms of maintenance, I'm afraid it's not much better than the cheap eQ2. The squeezed water tank may cause the engine to shift gears accordingly, especially on the co-pilot side with severe impact, which almost needs to be replaced, not to mention the full reimbursement of LED headlights, and one headlight may cost more than 10,000 yuan. At the same time, pay attention to the co-pilot side, the airbag has been opened, so the whole interior should be replaced, and internal injuries and injuries will be added. On the whole, it is not much less than the loss of eQ2, and may even exceed the former. After all, the front C-pillar has been carried. Of course, the focus of this accident is the benefits of having an extra trunk in the car. There is a subsidence area, and the size of the subsidence area is one of the very important factors in this accident. I have to say that sometimes the consumer's sixth sense is quite reliable. If you switch to the hatchback version of Yikai C3, I'm afraid it's another effect. Needless to say, it's naturally worse.
This article comes from car home, the author of the car manufacturer, and does not represent car home's position.