In the current IPO market, the identity of the consultant basically does not have the conditions and ability to produce the above materials, and it is ok for the intermediary to bridge the payment. However, in the future, IPO will tend to outsource the production of application materials. If the application materials are outsourced, there should be no essential difference between undergraduate and master, but if it is really consulting and intermediary, undergraduate is slightly lower.
I think it is ok to focus on the development prospect, but in the whole IPO work, investment banks pay the most attention to growth. The problems it needs to deal with and the contact with financial markets and industrialists are the best catalysts to directly promote the growth of newcomers. Only by making materials can we improve our copywriting ability. Want to pull money, want to be an intermediary, don't need a pawn. The boss only talks about the price directly, so the growth is not as good as that of investment banks, although it is a miscellaneous investment bank. But then again, investment banks have strong copywriting ability, and people who can talk can't be investment banks. If they can do a good job in IPO application materials, they can also jump into an ideal slot!