control power
The first way is the differentiated arrangement of voting rights. The voting rights differentiation arrangement is widely used in cross-border companies with overseas financing platforms, but under the current domestic legal framework, the applicable space is relatively limited.
The second way is the agreement of concerted parties or the entrustment of voting rights.
The third way is to achieve control through the board of directors.
The fourth way is to carry out platform management for specific shareholder groups.
In addition to the above-mentioned ways of actively protecting control rights, there is another way to protect the defendant, that is, the founder vetoes it with one vote.
If the founder's shareholding ratio has been diluted to the point where he can't directly control the company, and the voting rights differentiation arrangement, concerted action agreement, voting rights entrustment, board control and platform management of specific shareholders can't be implemented for various reasons, the founder can try to adopt a one-vote veto arrangement similar to that of investors to ensure that he can at least achieve passive control on major issues.