I don't know what happened in the middle, but I understand how excellent and precious it is to build a model to bring the company back to life. I once developed a style of play, which is not a pattern. It is to combine the play and play methods of high-passenger orders and low-passenger orders in the industry, each with its own advantages and a qualitative change. It is such a simple set of things that broke out with great vitality. Observing the people around me, I found it really difficult to establish a brand-new model. The interests, changes and contradictions of each link need to be understood and based on the company's resources. Insight, deductive ability and industry familiarity are indispensable.
In your wording, you inadvertently reveal the arrogance of a carnivorous boss, but there is also immaturity in blindly obeying your mentor. . . Unfortunately, if you are peeled off like an onion, what do you have? Do you have money with you? You don't have enough money, and you need investors' money to give you confidence. What investors are investing in is actually a Tang model. Do you have foresight? Is there a direction for the team to move forward? It's not reflected either.
Some time ago, a friend took a stake in a shop. I was very surprised when I saw the shop. How did this store live to be profitable now? My friend said that we should adjust the company and change personnel. My advice to her is: it's awesome that this store can survive like this. There must be one or two core figures in it, which may be inconspicuous. You must find them and save them.
The world is really funny sometimes. Those employees who fight alongside you and earn hundreds of millions of profits for you are inferior in your eyes. And those who are taller than you, in most cases, their help is extremely cheap, but they take away most of your respect. The investor gives you money, but it still belongs to him. Your advice is not as good as a model that changes the life and death of the company. But the profits earned by employees belong to you! Not as sweet as the money given by investors?
If the company positions you as a migrant worker, then your college degree is a shortcoming, because migrant workers calculate the value of working hours. If the company gives you the positioning of channels and expanding customers, in fact, your value is the number of customers and orders maintained by the company. It doesn't matter if you have a primary school education and don't come to work at ordinary times. How many orders and customers you can bring is your value.
If the company positions you as the person in charge of product technology, then the value of the developed products, technologies and patents is your value. Even if you own the technology, you will be kicked out of the patent right. No, the company is gone. However, you used a very vague description of "pattern getting through", which is not good for you. What do you mean "the pattern passed"? In the words of employing people, it is to explore a set of reproducible methods from product to sales, specifically a set of knowledge and experience about who to entrust to OEM products, on what platform to publicize them, and from what channels to clinch deals.
You are right to say that this set of things is of high value. Because beginners need to pay a lot of tuition fees to explore for themselves. But you're right. Nothing is worth it. Because if someone tells you these experiences, it's just a few words. Now that the company knows this information, your expansion value is gone. This matter has nothing to do with whether you have a college degree or not, but with what resources you have mastered.
For example, if you develop your current channel, the processing factory will recognize you and the customers will recognize you. Then the company will provide all your education. On the contrary, if all the docking people in the company have mastered it, everyone will cooperate in interests. Then you have to find your new position. After the commercial war, do you position yourself as a product, market or sales?
There are three major links that can ignore academic qualifications and rely on experience and technology. Other administration, personnel and finance must be substitutes for low education. Unless you are good-looking, the boss should support you. If it is a product, focus on product upgrade and performance, and find out the production process of its own product characteristics; It is the market that pays attention to marketing, captures customers, and speaks by the professionalism of content and operation; If it is sales, order taking and performance delivery, let the sales team serve you. Otherwise, it is really useless to just say that you are a "senior". Maybe it is the oldest person in the company except the boss and cleaning aunt, but no boss will give the co-founder's salary to cleaning aunt because of feelings.
Let's get this straight. There's not much you can do in your present situation. Although you said "the overall situation is the most important" in the description of the problem, there is only one word "money" between the lines, and you can only see money in front of you. Not only do I not understand the importance of talents, but I also don't understand the skills of controlling others. If I were you, I would look for an opportunity to talk to Tang when the company's profit model is stable.
I won't hide anything in this conversation, but tell him directly what I am doing and what I will do in the future, and I will also focus on his personal development plan in this conversation. Seeing that A Tang's shortcoming is "education" rather than "ability", it is not difficult to simply send him to fill the "shortcoming" while retaining his position and equity. I will help him get his bachelor's degree for the last time. Maybe I'll ask a friend to send him abroad for gold plating, or at least go to Southeast Asia to study for a master's degree.
All these operations, the loss is nothing more than money, and the money does not need to be paid in one lump sum, but it can be paid slowly in the next few years, but it is of great benefit to a Tang and you. First of all, Tang Can broke through his own shortcomings, filled the gap in academic qualifications, and systematically mastered relevant theories. This is very important for A Tang's personal development. Learning will always alternate between "practice" and "comprehension". A Tang's existing "knowledge" is summed up from "practice", but what he lacks is systematic knowledge. Whether you continue to work in your company after you come back from school or not, you can be his lifelong friend.