People who are old and have no background, no matter how many years you have worked in the company and the sex of the fetus, often change jobs when they transfer. From executives to operators, security guards, cleaners, etc. Not only has the office environment undergone earth-shaking changes, but wages have also decreased and working hours have also changed. After this change, many people often take the initiative to leave! What is the purpose of the company's layoffs? If you think about it, it is necessary to improve operating profit. According to the logic of the topic, does an old-fashioned person who can produce use value for the enterprise need to lay off employees? Do you need to keep a young man with little level and low output value? Therefore, the company pays attention to people who are qualified and can produce use value, not age.
Let's define old age first. Last year's wave of layoffs established and put forward the age standard for layoffs: over 34, so after 34, both men and women are at high risk. Since this is the case, there is no restriction on gender marriage life. Layoffs between the ages of 27 and 33 do take into account the balance between employee costs and benefits to a certain extent. Give priority to laying off employees who are worthless and may have potential cost risks. Naturally, the main point is that they are worthless. If she can create more value beneficial to the company, even if she may have children in the future and have a basketball club, the boss will not let her go. Therefore, all troubles can't compare with creating your own value, making yourself a valuable person that the company can't bear to use, and becoming a person who can create wealth for himself even if he is laid off.
As an old driver in the HR field for more than ten years. I don't particularly agree with what you said. Any layoff is to lay off the employees with the smallest relative surplus value, and the bourgeoisie's pursuit of perfection and maximization of interests will never become. Only when two people are compared under the same conditions, one is an older unmarried woman, and she will definitely be given priority. Because I can't understand the incomprehensible point of view, that is to say, older women have legal marriage leave, maternity leave, and parenting education in the later stage, so they can't devote themselves to their work. In fact, this concept is a thing of the past. Now, the company I came into contact with, the sense of responsibility and the concept of talent development have all changed. Most people think that this is the corporate social responsibility of the company. At the same time, the female employees in the third phase will not affect their work. Some are particularly delicate or have many physical conditions.